The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
One way functions and pseudorandom generators
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wyner, A. D. (1975) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1975.tb02040.x · Cited by 7,075
Goldwasser, S., & Micali, S. (1984) · Journal of Computer and System Sciences · doi:10.1016/0022-0000(84)90070-9 · Cited by 2,603
How to construct random functions
Goldreich, O., Goldwasser, S., & Micali, S. (1986) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/6490.6503 · Cited by 2,115
How to Generate Cryptographically Strong Sequences of Pseudorandom Bits
Blum, M., & Micali, S. (1984) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/0213053 · Cited by 1,322
Theory and application of trapdoor functions
Yao, A. C.-C. (1982) · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1982.95 · Cited by 1,008
Theory and application of trapdoor functions
Yao, A. C. (1982) · 23rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (sfcs 1982) · doi:10.1109/sfcs.1982.45 · Cited by 968
Average Case Complete Problems
Levin, L. A. (1986) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/0215020 · Cited by 424
Self-citationClass of constructive asymptotically good algebraic codes
Justesen, J. (1972) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.1972.1054893 · Cited by 294
On the generation of cryptographically strong pseudorandom sequences
Shamir, A. (1983) · ACM Transactions on Computer Systems · doi:10.1145/357353.357357 · Cited by 268
Randomness conservation inequalities; information and independence in mathematical theories
Levin, L. A. (1984) · Information and Control · doi:10.1016/s0019-9958(84)80060-1 · Cited by 256
Self-citationComparison of Two Pseudo-Random Number Generators
Blum, L., Blum, M., & Shub, M. (1983) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-0602-4_6 · Cited by 100
Cited by
Dolev, D., Dwork, C., & Naor, M. (1991) · Proceedings of the twenty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '91 · doi:10.1145/103418.103474 · Cited by 990
One-way functions are necessary and sufficient for secure signatures
Rompel, J. (1990) · Proceedings of the twenty-second annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '90 · doi:10.1145/100216.100269 · Cited by 695
How to play any mental game, or a completeness theorem for protocols with honest majority
Technion, Goldreich, O., Micali, S., MIT, Wigderson, A., & Hebrew University (2019) · Providing Sound Foundations for Cryptography: On the Work of Shafi Goldwasser and Silvio Micali · doi:10.1145/3335741.3335755 · Cited by 403
On-line/off-line digital signatures
Even, S., Goldreich, O., & Micali, S. (1996) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/bf02254791 · Cited by 318
A fair protocol for signing contracts
Ben-Or, M., Goldreich, O., Micali, S., & Rivest, R. L. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/18.50372 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Levin, L. A.
- Venue
- Combinatorica
- Published
- 1987-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 357-363
- ISSN
- 0209-9683 (ISSN-L)
- 1439-6912
- OpenAlex
- W2611398525
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 7.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
