The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Classification of reference models: a methodology and its application
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Analysis patterns: reusable objects models
Fowler, M. (1996) · Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. eBooks · Cited by 1,062
Typologies and taxonomies: An introduction to classification techniques.
Bailey, K. D. (1994) · Cited by 976
Bailey, K. (1994) · Sage eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781412986397 · Cited by 955
Understanding quality in conceptual modeling
Lindland, O. I., Sindre, G., & Solvberg, A. (1994) · IEEE Software · doi:10.1109/52.268955 · Cited by 873
ARIS — Business Process Modeling
Scheer, A. (1999) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-97998-9 · Cited by 794
Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes
Malone, T. W., Crowston, K., Lee, J., Pentland, B., Dellarocas, C., Wyner, G., Quimby, J., Osborn, C. S., Bernstein, A., Herman, G., et al. (1999) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.45.3.425 · Cited by 755
Guidelines of Business Process Modeling
Becker, J., Rosemann, M., & von Uthmann, C. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45594-9_3 · Cited by 467
ARIS Architecture and Reference Models for Business Process Management
Scheer, A.-W., & Nüttgens, M. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45594-9_24 · Cited by 340
Scheer, A.-W. (1994) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79142-0 · Cited by 241
A field guide to boxology: preliminary classification of architectural styles for software systems
Shaw, M., & Clements, P. (2002) · Proceedings Twenty-First Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC'97) · doi:10.1109/cmpsac.1997.624691 · Cited by 206
Metrics for Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models
Moody, D. L. (1998) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-49524-6_18 · Cited by 169
Enterprise modeling with UML: designing successful software through business analysis
Marshall, C. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 119
Frank, U. (1999) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 100
Extending data modeling to cover the whole enterprise
Scheer, A., & Hars, A. (1992) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/130994.131007 · Cited by 54
Evaluating the Quality of Reference Models
Vojislav, B., & Zhao, J. L. (2000) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/3-540-45393-8_35 · Cited by 47
(1986) · doi:10.1109/ms.1986.234397 · Cited by 13
Cited by
Business Process Management: A Comprehensive Survey
van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2013) · ISRN Software Engineering · doi:10.1155/2013/507984 · Cited by 828
Factors and measures of business process modelling: model building through a multiple case study
Bandara, W., Gable, G. G., & Rosemann, M. (2005) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000546 · Cited by 276
Al-Sabri, H. M., Al-Mashari, M., & Chikh, A. (2018) · Business Process Management Journal · doi:10.1108/bpmj-07-2016-0139 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Fettke, P., & Loos, P.
- Venue
- Information Systems and e-Business Management
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-53
- ISSN
- 1617-9846 (ISSN-L)
- 1617-9854
- OpenAlex
- W2086341257
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 37.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
