Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351Complex Systems and Decision MakingPublic Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and Political Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis

Hisschemöller, Matthijs, Hoppe, Rob·1995·Knowledge and Policy

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02832229

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Ackoff, R.L. (1974).Redesigning the future. New York: Wiley.
  2. Anderson, Ch.W. (1987). Political philosophy, practical reason, and policy analysis. In: F. Fischer and J. Forester (Eds.),Confronting values in policy analysis: The politics of criteria. Newbury Park: Sage.
  3. Bachrach, P. and M.S. Baratz (1970).Power and poverty: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
  4. Dahl, R.A. (1985).Nuclear weapons: Democracy versus guardianship. Syracuse: SUNY Press.
  5. Douglas, M., and Wildavsky, A. (1982).Risk and culture. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  6. Dunn, W.N. (1981).Public policy analysis. An introduction. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall
  7. Fischer, F. (1980).Politics, values, and public policy. The problem of methodology. Boulder: Westview Press.
  8. Hisschemöller, M. (1993).De Democratie van Problemen. De Relatie Tusen de Inhoud van Beleidsproblemen en Methoden van Politieke Besluitvorming. Amsterdam: Free University Press.
  9. Hoppe, R. (1989).Het Beleidsprobleem Geproblematiseerd: Over Beleid Ontwerpen en Probleemvorming. Muiderberg: Coutinho.
  10. Lasswell, H.D. (1951). The policy orientation. In: D. Lerner and H.D. Lasswell (Eds.),The policy sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  11. Meer, M, van der (1995). Mest, Natuur en het Ministerie van Landbouw. Een Politicologische Analyse van het Beleid met Behulp van de Theorie van M. Hisschemöller. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of Amsterdam.
  12. Mitroff, I.I., R.O. Mason and V.P. Barabba (1983).The 1980 census: Policy-making amid turbulence. Lexington: Heath
  13. Myrdal, G. (1944).An American dilemma. The negro problem and modern democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
  14. Schmitter, P.C. (1979). Still the century of corporatism? In: P.C. Schmitter and G. Lehmbruch (Eds.),Trends Towards Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage.
  15. Stone, D.A. (1988).Policy paradox and political reason. Chicago: Scott, Foresman.

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Hisschemöller, M., & Hoppe, R.
Venue
Knowledge and Policy
Published
1995-12
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
40-60
ISSN
  • 0897-1986 (ISSN-L)
  • 1874-6314
OpenAlex
W2111142248
Cited by
344
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 18
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Knowledge, technology & policy/Knowledge in society/Knowledge, technology, & policy (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Complex Systems and Decision Making
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Political Analysis
Keywords
problem structuring, policy design, policy analysis, policy disagreement, ill-structured problems, oversimplification, political participation, policy making, consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.