Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 223

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico

Bellon, Mauricio R., Brush, Stephen B.·1994·Economic Botany
DOI 10.1007/bf02908218
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf02908218

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Anderson, E. 1947. Field studies of Guatemalan maize. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 34:433–467. · DOI
  2. —,and H. Cutler. 1942. Races ofZea mays: I. Their recognition and classification. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 21: 69–88. · doi:10.2307/2394331
  3. Bellon, M. R. 1990. The ethnoecology of maize production under technological change. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Davis. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor.
  4. —. 1991. The ethnoecology of maize variety management: a case study from México. Human Ecology 19: 389–418. · DOI
  5. —,and J. E. Taylor. 1993. Farmer soil taxonomy and technology adoption. Economic Development and Cultural Change 41: 764–786. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bentley, J. W. 1987. Economic and ecological approaches to land fragmentation: in defense of a much-maligned phenomenon. Annual Review of Anthropology 15: 31–67. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Benz, B. F. 1987. Racial systematics and the evolution of Mexican maize. Pages 121–136in L. Man-zanilla, ed., Studies in the Neolithic and urban revolution: the V. Gordon Childe Colloquium. BAR International Series 349. B.A.R. Oxford.
  8. Binns, B. O. 1950. The consolidation of fragmented agricultural holdings. FAO Agricultural Studies 11, Washington, DC.
  9. Bretting, P.K., and M. M. Goodman. 1989. Karyo- typic variation in Mesoamerican races of maize and its systematic significance. Economic Botany 43: 107–124. · DOI
  10. Brush, S. B. 1992. Reconsidering the green revolution: diversity and stability in cradle areas of crop domestication. Human Ecology 20: 1–23. · DOI
  11. —. 1989. Rethinking crop genetic resource conservation. Conservation Biology 3: 19–29. · DOI
  12. —,M. Bellon-Corrales, and E. Schmidt. 1988. Agricultural development and maize diversity in Mexico. Human Ecology 16: 307–328. · doi:10.1007/bf00888449
  13. —,J. E. Taylor, and M. R. Bellon. 1992. Biological diversity and technology adoption in Andean potato agriculture. Journal of Development Economics 39: 365–387. · DOI · Paper page
  14. CAECECH (Campo Agrícola Experimental Centra de Chiapas). 1984. Maices contrastantes bajo diferentes condiciones de sequía intraestival en el centro de Chiapas. Pages 84–96in Informe anual de investigatión 1983. Centrode In vestigaciones Agrí- colas del Pacífico Sur, Tuxtla Gutiérrez, Chiapas.
  15. CIMMYT (Centra Internacional de Mejoramiento del Maíz y el Trigo). 1979. Progeny testing trials, experimental variety trials, elite variety trials. Supplementary Report Maize Program. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.
  16. —. 1988. International maize testing program 1988 report. CIMMYT, México, D.F.
  17. Doebley, J. F., M. M. Goodman, and C. W. Stuber. 1985. Isozyme variation in the races of maize from Mexico. American Journal of Botany 72: 629–639. · doi:10.1002/j.1537-2197.1985.tb08320.x
  18. Frankel, O. H., and M. E. Soule. 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  19. García, Er. 1979. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificación climática de Koeppen. Universidad National Autonóma de México, México, D.F.
  20. Goodman, M. M., and W. L. Brown. 1988. Races of corn. Pages 33–79in G. F. Sprague and J. W. Dudley (eds.), Corn and corn improvement. American Society of Agronomy, Inc., Madison.
  21. Hawkes, J. R. 1983. The diversity of crop plants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Hernández-Díaz, B. M. 1986. Caracterización de los Recursos Naturales en Relatión a su Utilizatión Productiva en la Subregión Tuxtla Gutiérrez. Chiapas. Universidad National Autónoma de México. Thesis.
  23. Hernández X., E. 1985. Maize and the greater Southwest. Economic Botany 39: 416–430. · DOI
  24. Johannessen, C. L. 1982. Domestication process of maize continues in Guatemala. Economic Botany 36: 84–99. · doi:10.1007/bf02858703
  25. Kato, Y., T. A. 1988. Cytological classification of maize race populations and its potential use. Pages 106–117in CIMMYT, recent advances in the conservation and utilization of genetic resources: proceedings of the Global Maize Germplasm Workshop. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F.
  26. Kirkby, A. V. T. 1973. The use of land and water resources in the past and present valley of Oaxaca. Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology No. 5. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  27. Mangelsdorf, P. C. 1974. Corn: its origin, evolution, and improvement. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Mapes, C. 1987. El maíz entre los Purépechas de la cuenca del lago de Pátzuaro, Michoacán, México, América Indígena 47(2): 345–379.
  29. Nigh, R. B. 1976. Evolutionary ecology of Maya agriculture in highland Chiapas, México. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation Stanford University. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor.
  30. Ortega-Paczka, R. 1973. Variatión en maíz y cambios socioeconómicos en Chiapas, México 1946-1971. Colegio de Postgraduados, ENA, Chapingo, México. Thesis.
  31. Rindos, D. 1989. Darwinism and its role in the explanation of domestication. Pages 27–41in D. R. Harris and G. C. Hillman, eds., Foraging and farming: the evolution of plant exploration. Unwin-Hy-man, London.
  32. Sanchez, J. J., and M. M. Goodman. 1992. Relationships among Mexican races of maize. Economic Botany 46: 72–85. · doi:10.1007/bf02985256
  33. Wellhausen, E., J. Roberts, L. M. Roberts, andE. Hernández X. 1952. Races of maize in México: their origin, characteristics, and distribution. The Bussey Institution, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA.
  34. Wellhausen, E. J., A. Fuentes O., and A. Hernández Corzo. 1957. Races of maize in Central America. Publication 511 National Academy of Sciences. National Research Council, Washington, DC.
  35. Wilkes, H. G. 1989. Maize: domestication, racial evolution and spread. Pages 440–455in D. R. Harris and G. D. Hillman, eds., Foraging and farming: the evolution of plant exploration. Unwin-Hyman, London.

Cited by

See all 223

Metadata

Authors
Bellon, M. R., & Brush, S. B.
Venue
Economic Botany
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1994-04
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
196-209
ISSN
  • 0013-0001 (ISSN-L)
  • 1874-9364
DOI
10.1007/bf02908218
OpenAlex
W38466429
Cited by
223
References
0
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf02908218
The paper
Bellon, M. R., & Brush, S. B. (1994). Keepers of maize in Chiapas, Mexico. Economic Botany. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02908218

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.