Cited by 41Healthcare cost, quality, practicesHealthcare Operations and Scheduling OptimizationClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Elimination of routine testing in patients undergoing cataract surgery allows substantial savings in laboratory costs. A brief report

Open access
Imasogie, Ngozi, Wong, David T., Luk, Ken, Chung, Frances·2003·Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the possible cost savings when routine preoperative testing is discontinued in ambulatory cataract surgery patients.Methods A policy was introduced at our hospital to stop routine testing in ambulatory cataract patients. Consecutive patients' medical records were analyzed in a four-month period pre- and a four-month period post-discontinuation of routine laboratory tests. Ambulatory cataract surgery is performed under topical (and sometimes retrobulbar block) anesthesia with iv sedation. Co-morbidities, perioperative events, frequency and cost of tests ordered were compared for the two groups. Average costs per patient pre- and post-discontinuation of routine tests, and total possible cost savings were calculated.Results One thousand two hundred and thirty-one patients were studied; 636 had routine laboratory tests and 595 had no routine laboratory tests. The ratios of gender, co-morbidities and perioperative events were similar in the two groups. There was a significant reduction in the number of tests ordered after the new policy was introduced, from 5.8 tests per patient to 0.4 tests per patient. The cost of tests per patient was reduced from Can $39.67 to $4.01.Conclusion In ambulatory cataract surgery, over 90% savings in laboratory costs is possible after elimination of routine tests.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03017792

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gimbel HV, Hamilton RC. The value of medical test- ing before cataract surgery. Ophthalmic Practice 2000; 18: 166-70.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Imasogie, N., Wong, D. T., Luk, K., & Chung, F.
Affiliations
University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Wong, David T.
Venue
Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie
Published
2003-03
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
246-248
ISSN
  • 0832-610X (ISSN-L)
  • 1496-8975
OpenAlex
W2004723031
Cited by
41
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
cataract surgery, preoperative blood tests, cost reduction, outpatient surgery, laboratory costs, comorbidities, topical anesthesia, retrobulbar block
MeSH terms
Ambulatory Surgical Procedures, Cataract Extraction, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Humans, Cost Savings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review