Cited by 223Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesHealthcare cost, quality, practicesEnhanced Recovery After Surgery

Elimination of Preoperative Testing in Ambulatory Surgery

Chung, Frances, Yuan, Hongbo, Yin, Ling, Vairavanathan, Santhira, Wong, David T.·2009·Anesthesia & Analgesia

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative testing has been criticized as having little impact on perioperative outcomes. We conducted a randomized, single-blind, prospective, controlled pilot study to determine whether indicated preoperative testing can be eliminated without increasing the perioperative incidence of adverse events in selected patients undergoing ambulatory surgery. METHODS: One thousand sixty-one eligible patients were randomized either to have indicated preoperative testing or no preoperative testing. In the indicated testing group, patients received indicated preoperative testing: a complete blood count, electrolytes, blood glucose, creatinine, electrocardiogram, and chest radiograph according to the Ontario Preoperative Testing Grid as per current practice, whereas in the no testing group, no testing was ordered. The investigators, data collectors, and patient outcome reviewers were blinded to the group assignment. The primary outcome measures were the rate of perioperative adverse events and the rates of adverse events within 7 and 30 days after surgery. RESULTS: Patients' age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, type of surgery, and anesthesia were similar between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the rates of perioperative adverse events and the rates of adverse events within 30 days after surgery between the no testing group and the indicated testing group. Hospital revisits <or=7 days were higher in the indicated testing group (P < 0.05). None of the adverse events were related to the indicated testing or no testing. CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study showed that there was no increase in the perioperative adverse events as a result of no preoperative testing in our study population. A larger study is needed to demonstrate that indicated testing may be safely eliminated in selected patients undergoing ambulatory surgery without increasing perioperative complications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1213/ane.0b013e318176bc19

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Chung, F., Yuan, H., Yin, L., Vairavanathan, S., & Wong, D. T.
Affiliations
University Health Network (CA)
Corresponding author
Chung, Frances
Venue
Anesthesia & Analgesia
Published
2009-02
Volume
108
Issue
2
Pages
467-475
ISSN
0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1985081372
Cited by
223
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
12.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Anesthesia & Analgesia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
Keywords
preoperative screening, outpatient surgery, perioperative complications, unnecessary testing, postoperative readmission, preoperative assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Ambulatory Surgical Procedures, Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Intraoperative Complications, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Postoperative Complications, Preoperative Care, Prospective Studies, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review