Cited by 24Malaria Research and ControlBiosensors and Analytical DetectionDigital Imaging for Blood Diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New strategies for the diagnosis and screening of malaria

Lee, SH, Kara, UAK, Koay, E, Lee, MA, Lam, S, Teo, D·2002·International Journal of Hematology

Abstract

Thin and thick blood film microscopy are the "gold standard" for malaria diagnosis. In recent years, there have been important developments in malaria diagnostic tests including fluorescence microscopy of malaria parasites stained with acridine orange, dipstick immunoassays that detect species-specific parasite antigens, and more recently, detection of parasite nucleic acids after amplification by PCR. With some of these methods, sensitivities and specificities approaching and even exceeding those of the thin and thick film can be attained. In particular, PCR-based tests for plasmodium DNA or RNA are more sensitive and specific than other tests for malarial parasites. A specific application for PCR diagnosis of malaria could be blood donor screening. Clinical trials of blood donor sreening for malarial parasites by PCR are being conducted, in which pooled donor samples are screened to increase efficiency and reduce costs. Some of the new diagnostic methods may have specific applications in particular settings, depending on the purpose and location of testing, and other factors such as cost, desired sensitivity and specificity, speed and ease of use.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03165265

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 24

Metadata

Authors
Lee, S., Kara, U., Koay, E., Lee, M., Lam, S., & Teo, D.
Affiliations
National University Hospital (SG)
ORCID
Teo, D
Venue
International Journal of Hematology
Published
2002-01
Volume
76
Issue
S1
Pages
291-293
ISSN
  • 0925-5710 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-3774
OpenAlex
W2073185482
Cited by
24
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Hematology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases
Keywords
malaria diagnosis, malaria screening, blood donor screening, PCR diagnosis, dipstick immunoassay, parasite antigens, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Blood Donors, Humans, Malaria, Mass Screening, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Clinical Laboratory Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review