Cited by 118Malaria Research and ControlBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingBiosensors and Analytical Detection

Detection and Species Determination of Malaria Parasites by PCR: Comparison with Microscopy and with ParaSight-F and ICT Malaria Pf Tests in a Clinical Environment

Open access
Tham, Jill M., Lee, Szu Hee, Tan, Theresa M. C., Ting, Robert C. Y., Kara, Ursula A. K.·1999·Journal of Clinical Microbiology

Abstract

A rapid procedure for the diagnosis of malaria infections directly from dried blood spots by PCR amplification was evaluated with samples from 52 patients. Plasmodium infections were identified with a genus-specific primer set, and species differentiation between Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax was analyzed by multiplex PCR. The PCR test with any of the three primer sets was able to detect as few as four parasites per microliter by gel electrophoresis or by nonisotopic paper hybridization chromatography. The diagnoses obtained by PCR correlated closely with those obtained by Giemsa staining except for two samples observed to have mixed P. falciparum-P. vivax infections. These were initially missed by microscopic analysis. In comparison with antigen-capture assays for P. falciparum, the PCR assays were able to detect three infections that were missed by the ParaSight-F test. The PCR test was negative for nine ParaSight-F-positive samples and one ICT Malaria Pf-positive sample, and these were confirmed to be false-positive results. The PCR thus gave no false-negative or false-positive results. Patients undergoing antimalarial therapy were also monitored by the PCR assay. Four of seven patients who were PCR positive for P. vivax at the time of discharge were later readmitted to the hospital with a recurrence of P. vivax infection. We would like to propose that PCR is a sensitive and easy method that can serve as a useful addition to microscopy for the diagnosis and th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/jcm.37.5.1269-1273.1999

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DNA-based molecular assays have demonstrated possible chronic detection in regions where malaria is endemic, which may be due to very low parasitemias in immune individuals.

    “Also, DNA-based molecular assays have demonstrated a possible chronic detection in regions of the world where malaria is endemic, which may be due to very low parasitemias in immune individuals (3, 19, 34).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tham, J. M., Lee, S. H., Tan, T. M. C., Ting, R. C. Y., & Kara, U. A. K.
Affiliations
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • National University Hospital (SG)
  • Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology (SG)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Published
1999-05
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
1269-1273
ISSN
  • 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-660X
OpenAlex
W1655808485
Cited by
118
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
FWCI
9.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Malaria Research and Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
Keywords
malaria diagnosis, Plasmodium falciparum, Plasmodium vivax, PCR detection, dried blood spots, species differentiation, multiplex PCR, Giemsa staining, antigen capture assay, false positives, treatment monitoring, relapse, mixed malaria infection
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Malaria, Plasmodium, Sensitivity and Specificity, Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review