The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Distributed Nature of Working Memory
Christophel, T. B., Klink, P. C., Spitzer, B., Roelfsema, P. R., & Haynes, J.-D. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.12.007 · Cited by 882
Cardinal rules: visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics
Girshick, A. R., Landy, M. S., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2831 · Cited by 613
Metamers of the ventral stream
Freeman, J., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2889 · Cited by 667
Best practices in eye tracking research
Carter, B. T., & Luke, S. G. (2020) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.05.010 · Cited by 659
Representing multiple objects as an ensemble enhances visual cognition
Alvarez, G. A. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.01.003 · Cited by 586
Metadata
- Authors
- Mizuno, A., & Ohta, Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Visualization
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-1
- ISSN
- 1343-8875 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-8975
- OpenAlex
- W2088633797
- Cited by
- 1,042
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bf03181556
- The paper
- Mizuno, A., & Ohta, Y. (2006). A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique. Journal of Visualization. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03181556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
