Cited by 667Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

Metamers of the ventral stream

Open access
Freeman, Jeremy, Simoncelli, Eero P·2011·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

The human capacity to recognize complex visual patterns emerges in a sequence of brain areas known as the ventral stream, beginning with primary visual cortex (V1). We developed a population model for mid-ventral processing, in which nonlinear combinations of V1 responses are averaged in receptive fields that grow with eccentricity. To test the model, we generated novel forms of visual metamers, stimuli that differ physically but look the same. We developed a behavioral protocol that uses metameric stimuli to estimate the receptive field sizes in which the model features are represented. Because receptive field sizes change along the ventral stream, our behavioral results can identify the visual area corresponding to the representation. Measurements in human observers implicate visual area V2, providing a new functional account of neurons in this area. The model also explains deficits of peripheral vision known as crowding, and provides a quantitative framework for assessing the capabilities and limitations of everyday vision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.2889

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Kovesi P Image features from phase congruency Videre: Journal of Computer Vision Research 1999

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Freeman, J., & Simoncelli, E. P.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Freeman, Jeremy
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2011-08-14
Volume
14
Issue
9
Pages
1195-1201
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2034676897
Cited by
667
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 55 · 2015: 53 · 2014: 38 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 21
FWCI
14.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
ventral stream, metamers, receptive field size, eccentricity, visual area V2, visual crowding, peripheral vision, population coding, primary visual cortex, visual pattern recognition, perceptual equivalence
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Color Perception, Eye Movements, Female, Humans, Male, Models, Biological, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Photic Stimulation, Psychometrics, Psychophysics, Visual Cortex, Visual Fields, Visual Pathways, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review