Cited by 40Medication Adherence and ComplianceStatistical Methods in Clinical TrialsEthics in Clinical Research

Strategies to Measure and Improve Patient Adherence in Clinical Trials

Matsui, Doreen·2009·Pharmaceutical Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03256784

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Matsui, D.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Corresponding author
Matsui, Doreen
Venue
Pharmaceutical Medicine
Published
2009-10
Volume
23
Issue
5-6
Pages
289-297
ISSN
  • 0265-0673 (ISSN-L)
  • 1178-2595
  • 1179-1993
OpenAlex
W1984883552
Cited by
40
References
78
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Pharmaceutical Medicine (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
medication adherence, clinical trial compliance, adherence measurement, pill count, self-report, run-in period, fixed-dose combination, smart pillbox, text messaging, dosing frequency, patient expectations, barriers to adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review