The HST SM4 relative navigation sensor system: overview and preliminary testing results from the flight robotics lab
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Naasz et al. [12] and Cavrois et al. [21] tested monocular cameras down to 0.5 meters from the target and down to actual docking, respectively.
“Naasz et al. [12] and Cavrois et al. [21] tested monocular cameras down to 0.5 meters from the target and down to actual docking, respectively.”
From Review of the robustness and applicability of monocular pose estimation systems for relative navigation with an uncooperative spacecraft (2019) · cites this paper as [12]
In both implementations [12] and [16], filter dynamics were highly simplified and no perturbation models were included.
“However, in both implementations the filter dynamics were highly simplified and no perturbation models were included.”
From Review of the robustness and applicability of monocular pose estimation systems for relative navigation with an uncooperative spacecraft (2019) · cites this paper as [12]
Other authors [12,22] implemented the technique proposed in [47] and the ULTOR engine [48] in their GNFIR and ULTOR algorithms, respectively, for pose tracking.
“Aside from the listed solvers adopted to solve the pose initialization problem, other authors [12,22] implemented the technique proposed in [47] and the ULTOR engine [48] in their Goddard Natural Feature Image Recognition (GNFIR) and UL-415 TOR algorithms, respectively, for the pose tracking.”
From Review of the robustness and applicability of monocular pose estimation systems for relative navigation with an uncooperative spacecraft (2019) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
Bradski, G. R. (2000) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 5,994 · see citing works
Three-dimensional computer vision: a geometric viewpoint
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-0357 · Cited by 3,030 · see citing works
Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control
(1978) · Astrophysics and Space Science Library · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9907-7 · Cited by 1,892 · see citing works
Pyramidal implementation of the Lucas Kanade feature tracker description of the algorithm
Bouguet, J.-Y. (1999) · Cited by 1,557 · see citing works
Blake, A., & Yuille, A. (1993) · Cited by 1,380 · see citing works
Shreiner, D. (2013) · Addison-Wesley eBooks · Cited by 655 · see citing works
Attitude Error Representations for Kalman Filtering
Markley, F. L. (2003) · Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics · doi:10.2514/2.5048 · Cited by 633 · see citing works
Real-time visual tracking of complex structures
Drummond, T., & Cipolla, R. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2002.1017620 · Cited by 598 · see citing works
Compact Numerical Methods for Computers: Linear Algebra and Function Minimisation
Nash, J. C. (1990) · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Navigator GPS Receiver for Fast Acquisition and Weak Signal Space Applications
Winternitz, L. B., Moreau, M. C., Boegner, G., et al. (2004) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Pose estimation for servicing of orbital replacement units in a cluttered enironment
Chien, C.-H., & Baker, K. (2004) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/robot.2004.1302533 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
ULTOR passive pose and position engine for spacecraft relative navigation
Hannah, S. J. (2008) · SPIE Proceedings · doi:10.1117/12.777193 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Building a GPS Receiver for Space Lessons Learned
Sirotzky, S., Heckler, G. W., Boegner, G., et al. (2008) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Opromolla, R., Fasano, G., Rufino, G., & Grassi, M. (2017) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.07.001 · Cited by 330 · see citing works
Pasqualetto Cassinis, L., Fonod, R., & Gill, E. (2019) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.05.008 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Autonomous relative navigation around uncooperative spacecraft based on a single camera
Pesce, V., Opromolla, R., Sarno, S., Lavagna, M., & Grassi, M. (2019) · Aerospace Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.042 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Wang, Z., Chen, M., Guo, Y., Li, Z., & Yu, Q. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · doi:10.1109/taes.2023.3250385 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Naasz, B. J., Burns, R. D., Queen, S. Z., Van Eepoel, J., Hannah, J., & Skelton, E.
- Affiliations
- Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
- Advanced Optical Systems (United States) (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 457-483
- ISSN
- 0021-9142 (ISSN-L)
- 2195-0571
- OpenAlex
- W2099121015
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Space Technology and Applications
- Keywords
- pose estimation, avionics, lighting conditions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
