Cited by 21Historical and Archaeological StudiesHistorical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesMaritime and Coastal Archaeology

Discovery of human remains from Sir John Franklin’s last expedition

Beattie, Owen B., Savelle, James M.·1983·Historical Archaeology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03373469

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beattie, O. B., & Savelle, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Beattie, Owen B.
Venue
Historical Archaeology
Published
1983-07
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
100-105
ISSN
  • 0440-9213 (ISSN-L)
  • 2328-1103
OpenAlex
W2527656563
Cited by
21
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Historical and Archaeological Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Maritime and Coastal Archaeology
Keywords
Franklin expedition, skeletal remains, King William Island, Northwest Passage, Arctic exploration, 19th century, grave finds, Arctic archaeology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review