CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 32Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesPhilosophy, History, and HistoriographyArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 121 of the 121 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Archaeology and the Time of Modernity

González-Ruibal, Alfredo·2016·Historical Archaeology
DOI 10.1007/bf03377339
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In this article an archaeological critique of the time of modernity is proposed This critique is developed through three main themes: materiality, multi-temporality, and ethics. Materiality is key to producing relevant archaeological accounts of the time of modernity: historical archaeology has to follow the time of things, rather than the temporal frameworks inherited from history and other fields. Multitemporality is at the heart of modernity, which has to be understood as a heterogeneous phenomenon in which multiple, often incompatible, temporalities coalesce and clash, rather than as an homogeneous time of change and acceleration. Finally, the blurring of the past/present divide that is manifested through universal justice, political temporalities, and indigenous memory practices poses an important challenge to archaeology, but, at the same time, provides a unique opportunity to make the discipline socially relevant.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf03377339

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Anderson, Stanford 1999 Memory without Monuments: Vernacular Architecture. Traditional Dwellings and Settlements Review 11(1):13–22.
  2. Barroso, Rafael, José Carrobles, Jorge Morín de Pablos, José Ramos, Antonio Malalana, José Luis Isabel, and Luis A. Ruiz Casero 2014 Los Cigarrales de Toledo en la Guerra Civil: Un paisaje efímero (The Cigarrales of Toledo in the Civil War: An ephemeral landscape). In Los paisajes culturales de la ciudad de Toledo: Los cigarrales. Dehesas, espacios irrigados, torres, cigarrales y trincheras, José Carrobles and Jorgen Morín de Pablos, editors, pp. 383–434. British Archaeological Reports, International Series 2638. Archaeopress, Oxford, UK.
  3. Bauman, Zygmunt 2000 Liquid Modernity. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
  4. Bruno, Giuliana 2011 Modernist Ruins, Filmic Archaeologies. In Ruins, Brian Dillon, editor, pp. 76–81. MIT Press, Boston, MA.
  5. Calveiro, Pilar 2008 Podery desaparición: los campos de concentración en Argentina (Power and disappearance: The concentration camps in Argentina). Colihue, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
  6. Chaves, Julián, Candela Chaves, Cayetano Ibarra, Javier Martín Bastos, and Laura Muñoz Encinar 2014 Proyecto Recuperación de la Memoria Histórica en Extremadura. Balance de una década (2003–2013): Investigación de la Guerra Civil y el Franquismo (Recovery of Historical Memory Project in Extremadura. Balance of a decade [2003–2013]: Research on the Civil War and Francoism). Reyego, Zafra, Spain.
  7. Cresswell, Tim 2006 On the Move: Mobility in the Modern World. Routledge, London, UK.
  8. Hardesty, Donald 1988 The Archaeology of Mining and Miners: A View from the Silver State. Society for Historical Archaeology, Pleasant Hill, CA.
  9. Herbert, Martin 2011 The Dead Town. In Ruins, Brian Dillon, editor, pp. 198–191. MIT Press, Boston, MA.
  10. Lévi-Strauss, Claude 1955 Tristes tropiques (Sad tropics). Plon, Paris, France.
  11. Martínez Reverte, Jorge M. 2009 El arte de matar: Cómo se hizo la Guerra Civil Española (The art of war: The making of the Spanish Civil War). RBA, Barcelona, Spain.
  12. Mate, Manuel-Reyes 2003 En torno a la justicia anamnética (Around anamnestic justice). In La ética ante las víctimas, José Manuel Mardones and Manuel-Reyes Mate, editors, pp. 100–125. Anthropos, Barcelona, Spain.
  13. Mayer, Arno J. 1981 The Persistence of the Old Regime: Europe to the Great War. Pantheon, New York, NY.
  14. Olivier, Laurent 2008 Le sombre abîme du temps: Archéologie et mémoire (The dark abyss oftime:Archaeology and memory). Seuil, Paris, France.
  15. Polo Cerdá, Manuel, Eva García-Prósper, Elisa Cruz Rico, and Elena Ruiz Conde 2012 Fosas comunes exhumadas en el territorio de la agrupación guerrillera de Levante y Aragón (2005–2011) (Exhumed mass graves in the territory of the guerrilla group of Levante and Aragon [2005–2011]). Boletin Galego de Medicina Legal e Forense 18: 99–116.
  16. Schmidt, Peter R., and Stephen A. Mrozowski 2013 The Death of Prehistory: Reforming the Past, Looking to the Future. In The Death of Prehistory, P. R. Schmidt and S. A. Mrozowski, editors, pp. 1–28. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
González-Ruibal, A.
Venue
Historical Archaeology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-09
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
144-164
ISSN
  • 0440-9213 (ISSN-L)
  • 2328-1103
DOI
10.1007/bf03377339
OpenAlex
W2563546247
Cited by
32
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
10.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Historical Archaeology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Philosophy, History, and Historiography
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
materiality, multitemporality, ethics in archaeology, universal justice, political temporality, critique of modernity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review