Cited by 122

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Agency, practical politics and the archaeology of culture contact

Silliman, Stephen·2001·Journal of Social Archaeology

Abstract

I use this paper to intersect the trajectory of the agency concept in archaeology. On a theoretical front, I summarize briefly the state of ‘agency’ in archaeology and its deployment in theories of practice. This opens a space to introduce the concepts of practical politics and doxa, and I illustrate their effectiveness in addressing issues of social relations, power, identity and daily practice. I then pinpoint their particular applicability to colonial and culture-contact studies. On an empirical front, I turn the lenses of doxa and practical politics to a case study in nineteenth-century northern California. My focus is on Native American involvement in the Rancho Petaluma and the continuity of lithic practices in this secular colonial setting. I conclude that although lithic practices display a material continuity in technology, they are in fact part of a social change surrounding the politics of practice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/146960530100100203

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within colonialism, the imperative has been to find hybrid identities between colonizer and colonized, often locating resistance and agency of colonized subjects within this process.

    “Within colonialism, the imperative has been to find the hybrid identities between colonizer and colonized, often locating resistance and agency of colonized subjects within this process (e.g., Fennell 2007; Silliman 2001; cf. Liebmann and Murphy 2011 on limiting the use of resistance).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Allen, R., 1998, Native Americans at Mission Santa Cruz, 1791-1834: Interpreting the Archaeological Record
  2. 10.1007/978-1-4899-1115-5_4 · DOI
  3. Barrett, J.C., 2000, Agency in Archaeology, 61
  4. 10.1086/204471 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1017/CBO9780511812507 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1007/978-1-4615-4769-3 · DOI
  7. De Certeau, M., 1984, The Practice of Everyday Life
  8. Clemmer, J.S., 1961, The Corrals at Vallejo’s Petaluma Adobe State Historical Monument
  9. Costello, J., 1989, Columbian Consequences, Volume 1, 303
  10. Cowgill, G., 2000, Agency in Archaeology, 51
  11. Davis, W.H., 1929, Seventy-Five Years in California 1831-1906
  12. Deetz, J., 1963, UCLA Archaeological Survey Annual Report, 5, 163
  13. 10.1080/00438243.1995.9980291 · DOI
  14. Dobres, M.-A., 2000, Technology and Social Agency: Outlining an Anthropological Framework for Archaeology
  15. 10.1007/BF02231876 · DOI
  16. Dobres, M.-A., 2000, Agency in Archaeology, 3
  17. Donley-Reid, L.W., 1990, Domestic Architecture and the Use of Space, 114
  18. Foucault, M., 1979, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison
  19. Gebhardt, C.L., 1962, Historic Archaeology at Vallejo’s Petaluma Adobe State Historical Monument
  20. Gero, J.M., 2000, Agency and Archaeology, 34
  21. 10.1007/978-1-349-16161-4 · DOI
  22. Giddens, A., 1984, The Constitution of Society
  23. Gilchrist, R., 1994, Gender and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Religious Women
  24. Greenwood, R.S., 1989, Columbian Consequences, Volume 1, 451
  25. 10.1007/978-1-4899-1289-3_2 · DOI
  26. Hodder, I., 1991, Reading the Past
  27. Hodder, I., 2000, Agency in Archaeology, 21
  28. Hoover, R.L., 1985, Excavations at Mission San Antonio 1976-1978
  29. 10.1080/2052546.1993.11931686 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0278-4165(89)90024-X · DOI
  31. 10.4324/9780203438732 · DOI
  32. Jones, S., 1999, Historical Archaeology: Back from the Edge, 219
  33. 10.1086/204473 · DOI
  34. 10.2307/2694694 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/BF02428070 · DOI
  36. Milliken, R.T., 1995, A Time of Little Choice: The Disintegration of Tribal Culture in the San Francisco Bay Area 1769-1810
  37. O’Farrell, J., 1848, Map of the Land of Petaluma, Confirmed 1871
  38. 10.1017/S0010417500010811 · DOI
  39. Pauketat, T.R., 2000, Agency in Archaeology, 113
  40. Paynter, R., 1991, The Archaeology of Inequality, 1
  41. 10.1086/204149 · DOI
  42. Rosenus, A., 1995, General M.G. Vallejo and the Advent of the Americans: A Biography
  43. 10.3998/mpub.6773 · DOI
  44. Sahlins, M., 1985, Islands of History
  45. Sánchez, F.A., 1986, Masterkey, 60, 16
  46. Scott, J.C., 1985, Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance
  47. Scott, J.C., 1990, Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts
  48. Shackel, P., 2000, Agency and Archaeology, 232
  49. Shanks, M., 1987, Social Theory and Archaeology
  50. Silliman, S.W., 1997, The Native Alaskan Neighborhood, A Multiethnic Community at Colony Ross, 136
  51. Silliman, S.W. (2000) ‘Colonial Worlds, Indigenous Practices: The Archaeology of Labor on a 19th-Century California Rancho’. PhD dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Berkeley.
  52. Silliman, S.W., 2001, Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 19
  53. Smilie, R.S., 1975, The Sonoma Mission, San Francisco Solano de Sonoma: The Founding, Ruin, and Restoration of California’s 21st Mission
  54. 10.4159/9780674044326 · DOI
  55. 10.1007/BF03373584 · DOI
  56. Vallejo, M.G., 1875, Recuerdos Historicos y Personales Tocante a la Alta California: Historica Politica del Pais [Historical and Personal Memoirs Relating to Alta California: Political History of the Country]
  57. 10.1086/317405 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Wobst, M., 2000, Agency and Archaeology, 40

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Silliman, S.
Venue
Journal of Social Archaeology
Published
2001-10
Volume
1
Issue
2
Pages
190-209
ISSN
  • 1469-6053
  • 1741-2951
Cited by
122
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review