The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Formal Methods: State of the Art and Future Directions
Clarke, E., Wing, J. M., & Jones, C. B. (1996) · doi:10.25405/ncl.34123050 · Cited by 1,122
Self-citationModel Checking of Safety Properties
Kupferman, O., & Vardi, M. Y. (2001) · Formal Methods in System Design · doi:10.1023/a:1011254632723 · Cited by 566
A survey of recent advances in SAT-based formal verification
Prasad, M. R., Biere, A., & Gupta, A. (2005) · International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer · doi:10.1007/s10009-004-0183-4 · Cited by 279
Towards Verified Artificial Intelligence
Seshia, S. A., Sadigh, D., & Sastry, S. S. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1606.08514 · Cited by 142
Logic-based technologies for multi-agent systems: a systematic literature review
Calegari, R., Ciatto, G., Mascardi, V., & Omicini, A. (2021) · Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems · doi:10.1007/s10458-020-09478-3 · Cited by 117
“MCMAS supports a rich set of specifications, includingComputation Tree Logic (CTL, [85]) operators, epistemic operators, ATL, and notions pertaining to correct behaviour.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Clarke, E. M., & Emerson, E. A.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer-Verlag
- Published
- 2005-11-19
- Pages
- 52-71
- OpenAlex
- W1590315663
- Cited by
- 2,219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 89.23
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bfb0025774
- The paper
- Clarke, E. M., & Emerson, E. A. (2005). Design and synthesis of synchronization skeletons using branching time temporal logic. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0025774
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
