Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 473

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 145 of the 145 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Presynaptic inhibition in the vertebrate central nervous system

Schmidt, Robert F.·2006·Ergebnisse der Physiologie Reviews of Physiology
DOI 10.1007/bfb0047741
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bfb0047741

Cites

145 of 145 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 473

Metadata

Authors
Schmidt, R. F.
Venue
Ergebnisse der Physiologie Reviews of Physiology
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published
2006-07-27
Volume
63
Pages
20-101
DOI
10.1007/bfb0047741
OpenAlex
W1528357034
Cited by
473
References
145
FWCI
12.20
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.