The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Immobilization induces changes in presynaptic control of group Ia afferents in healthy humans
Open accessAbstract
Neural plasticity occurs throughout adult life in response to maturation, use and disuse. Recent studies have documented that H‐reflex amplitudes increase following a period of immobilization. To elucidate the mechanisms contributing to the increase in H‐reflex size following immobilization we immobilized the left foot and ankle joint for 2 weeks in 12 able‐bodied subjects. Disynaptic reciprocal inhibition of soleus (SOL) motoneurons and presynaptic control of SOL group Ia afferents was measured before and after the immobilization as well as following 2 weeks of recovery. Following immobilization, maximal voluntary plantar‐ and dorsiflexion torque (MVC) was significantly reduced and the maximal SOL H‐reflex amplitude increased with no changes in the maximal compound motor response (M max). Decreased presynaptic inhibition of the Ia afferents probably contributed to the increase of the H‐reflex size, since we observed a significant decrease in the long‐latency depression of the SOL H‐reflex evoked by peroneal nerve stimulation (D2 inhibition) and an increase in the size of the monosynaptic Ia facilitation of the SOL H‐reflex evoked by femoral nerve stimulation. These two measures provide independent evidence of changes in presynaptic inhibition of SOL Ia afferents and taken together suggest that GABAergic presynaptic inhibition of the SOL Ia afferents is decreased following 2 weeks of immobilization. The depression of the SOL H‐reflex when evoked at intervals shorter than 10 s (homosynaptic post‐activation depression) also decreased following immobilization, suggesting that the activity‐dependent regulation of transmitter release from the afferents was also affected by immobilization. We observed no significant changes in disynaptic reciprocal Ia inhibition. Two weeks after cast removal measurements returned to pre‐immobilization levels. Together, these observations suggest that disuse causes plastic changes in spinal interneuronal circuitries responsible for presynaptic control of sensory input to the spinal cord. This may be of significance for the motor disabilities seen following immobilization as well as the development of spasticity following central motor lesions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neuronal factors have been specified by increased coactivation of antagonistic muscles in voluntary movement, increasing the vector force that counteracts movement direction, as well as adaptations on the spinal circuitries and supraspinal level within the central nervous system.
“However, the neuronal factors have been specified by an increased coactivation of antagonistic muscles in voluntary movement (92) increasing the vector force, which counteracts the movement direction as well as adaptations on the spinal circuitries and supraspinal level within the central nervous system (93, 94).”
From Nonuniform loss of muscle strength and atrophy during bed rest: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [93]
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSensory input is processed and integrated differently into motor programs after periods of disuse, and the excitability of interneurons of the motor cortex and spinal alpha motoneurons is modulated in response to immobilization.
“Sensory input is processed and integrated differently into motor programs after periods of disuse (93), and the excitability of interneurons of the motor cortex and spinal alpha motoneurons is modulated in response to immobilization (94).”
From Nonuniform loss of muscle strength and atrophy during bed rest: a systematic review (2021) · cites this paper as [93]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CORTICAL PLASTICITY: From Synapses to Maps
Buonomano, D. V., & Merzenich, M. M. (1998) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.149 · Cited by 2,083 · cited 1×
“Experience-driven central nervous plasticity has been extensively documented at a cortical level in relation to motor learning (Buonomano & Merzenich, 1998; Sanes & Donoghue, 2000) and there is growing evidence that the cortical plasticity accompanying motor skill learning is paralleled by changes…”
BackgroundChanges in presynaptic inhibition of Ia fibres at the onset of voluntary contraction in man.
Hultborn, H., Meunier, S., Pierrot‐Deseilligny, E., & Shindo, M. (1987) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016681 · Cited by 480
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 75
- Anderson J, 1999, Reflex and muscular adaptations in rat soleus muscle after hindlimb suspension, J Exp Biol, 202, 2701, 10.1242/jeb.202.19.2701 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/123.8.1688 · DOI
- Baldissera F, 1981, Handbook of Physiology, section 1, The Nervous System, 509
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5692-07.2008 · DOI
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.06-05-01308.1986 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1995.73.1.411 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.01402.2005 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.01404.2005 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.091835 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016652 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00230098 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00230683 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017759 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1960.sp006393 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00690897 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1998.79.3.1329 · DOI
- Duchateau J, 1995, Bed rest induces neural and contractile adaptations in triceps surae, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 27, 1581
- 10.1152/jappl.1987.62.6.2168 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0079-6123(08)60618-4 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.2002.88.4.1664 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00229628 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/117.6.1449 · DOI
- Frank K, 1957, Presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibition of monosynaptic reflexes, Federation Proceeding, 39
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1979.sp012807 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00421-004-1225-z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00221-007-1142-6 · DOI
- 10.3200/JMBR.39.1.68-78 · DOI
- Hultborn H, 2004, Key mechanisms for setting the input‐output gain across the motoneuron pool, Prog Brain Res, 143, 77
- 10.1007/BF00227268 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1987.sp016680 · DOI
- Hultborn H, 1998, Presynaptic Inhibition and Neural Control, 178
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1996.sp021207 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.49.8.937 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(84)90967-3 · DOI
- Kandel ER, 2000, Principles of Neural Science
- 10.1093/brain/111.2.417 · DOI
- 10.1007/s004210000330 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0006-8993(90)90542-J · DOI
- 10.1007/PL00005765 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1992.sp018996 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00232189 · DOI
- 10.1152/japplphysiol.00687.2007 · DOI
- Manabe T, 1989, Disuse‐induced enhancement of Ia synaptic transmission in spinal motoneurons of the rat, J Neurosci, 9, 2455, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-07-02455.1989 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.122911 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1989.sp017896 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002210050357 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00234121 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1971.34.6.1010 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002210050388 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1748-1716.1993.tb09515.x · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019652 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00228827 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/118.4.995 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1050-6411(02)00023-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0079-6123(00)28007-2 · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.00988.2007 · DOI
- 10.1113/jphysiol.2005.089904 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0165-0270(98)00044-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0301-0082(96)00002-0 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00237499 · DOI
- Pinco M, 1993, Modulation of monosynaptic excitation in the neonatal rat spinal cord, J Neurophysiol, 70, 1151, 10.1152/jn.1993.70.3.1151 · DOI
- 10.1016/0166-2236(90)90084-N · DOI
- 10.1016/S0079-6123(02)36033-3 · DOI
- 10.1007/s002210050933 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.393 · DOI
- 10.1007/BFb0047741 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jelekin.2005.10.008 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0507k.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0521k.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-201X.2001.00853.x · DOI
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199808)21:8<1006::AID-MUS4>3.0.CO;2-C · DOI
- 10.1113/expphysiol.1984.sp002860 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2006.01656.x · DOI
- 10.1152/jn.1983.50.6.1296 · DOI
- 10.1016/0006-8993(83)91059-4 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Nonuniform loss of muscle strength and atrophy during bed rest: a systematic review
Marusic, U., Narici, M., Simunic, B., Pisot, R., & Ritzmann, R. (2021) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00363.2020 · Cited by 185
Vila-Chã, C., Falla, D., & Farina, D. (2010) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01213.2009 · Cited by 178
In Vivo Alterations in Skeletal Muscle Form and Function after Disuse Atrophy
CLARK, B. C. (2009) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e3181a645a6 · Cited by 131
Changes in corticospinal transmission following 8 weeks of ankle joint immobilization
Leukel, C., Taube, W., Rittweger, J., Gollhofer, A., Ducos, M., Weber, T., & Lundbye-Jensen, J. (2015) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2014.04.002 · Cited by 27
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lundbye‐Jensen, J., & Nielsen, J. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Copenhagen (DK)
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-09
- Volume
- 586
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 4121-4135
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- PMC
- PMC2652189
- OpenAlex
- W1866755470
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk
- Elsass Fonden
- Kulturministeriet
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
- Keywords
- immobilization, disuse, Ia afferents, presynaptic inhibition, GABAergic inhibition, H-reflex, post-activation depression, neuroplasticity, spasticity
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Afferent Pathways, Ankle, Electric Stimulation, Female, Femoral Nerve, Foot, Humans, Male, Muscle Contraction, Neural Inhibition, Synaptic Transmission, Neuronal Plasticity, Neurons, Afferent, Peroneal Nerve, Restraint, Physical, Spinal Cord, Presynaptic Terminals, Muscle, Skeletal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review