The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimistic fair exchange of digital signatures: Extended abstract
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1978) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/359340.359342 · Cited by 13,462
A method for obtaining digital signatures and public-key cryptosystems
Rivest, R. L., Shamir, A., & Adleman, L. (1983) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/357980.358017 · Cited by 13,012
Random oracles are practical: a paradigm for designing efficient protocols
Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (1993) · Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on Computer and communications security - CCS '93 · doi:10.1145/168588.168596 · Cited by 4,712
How To Prove Yourself: Practical Solutions to Identification and Signature Problems
Fiat, A., & Shamir, A. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-47721-7_12 · Cited by 3,943
Efficient signature generation by smart cards
Schnorr, C. P. (1991) · Journal of Cryptology · doi:10.1007/bf00196725 · Cited by 2,787
Wallet Databases with Observers
Chaum, D., & Pedersen, T. P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48071-4_7 · Cited by 1,292
Lower Bounds for Discrete Logarithms and Related Problems
Shoup, V. (1997) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-69053-0_18 · Cited by 1,229
Self-citationNon-Interactive Zero-Knowledge Proof of Knowledge and Chosen Ciphertext Attack
Rackoff, C., & Simon, D. R. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-46766-1_35 · Cited by 1,039
Bellare, M., & Rogaway, P. (1995) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0053428 · Cited by 906
Untraceable Off-line Cash in Wallet with Observers
Brands, S. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48329-2_26 · Cited by 507
Cited by
A practical public key cryptosystem provably secure against adaptive chosen ciphertext attack
Cramer, R., & Shoup, V. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0055717 · Cited by 1,437
Self-citationA Practical and Provably Secure Coalition-Resistant Group Signature Scheme
Ateniese, G., Camenisch, J., Joye, M., & Tsudik, G. (2000) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-44598-6_16 · Cited by 800
A Survey on Blockchain Interoperability: Past, Present, and Future Trends
Belchior, R., Vasconcelos, A., Guerreiro, S., & Correia, M. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3471140 · Cited by 757
Securing threshold cryptosystems against chosen ciphertext attack
Shoup, V., & Gennaro, R. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054113 · Cited by 257
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Asokan, N., Shoup, V., & Waidner, M.
- Venue
- Lecture Notes in Computer Science
- Publisher
- Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- Published
- 1998
- Pages
- 591-606
- ISSN
- 0302-9743 (ISSN-L)
- 1611-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2210874835
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 13.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimistic fair exchange of digital signatures: Extended abstract. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/bfb0054156
- The paper
- Asokan, N., Shoup, V., & Waidner, M. (1998). Optimistic fair exchange of digital signatures: Extended abstract. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/bfb0054156
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
