Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 190

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sharpening the weak gravity conjecture with dimensional reduction

Heidenreich, Ben, Reece, Matthew, Rudelius, Tom·2016·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep02(2016)140
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep02(2016)140

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Boosting a black string charged under a 1-form. Finite boosts of sub-extremal black strings remain sub-extremal black holes after dimensional reduction. Infinite boosts yield the extremal KK charged black hole, whereas finite boosts of extremal black strings map out the remaining extremal black holes with both charges nonzero.
Figure 1 Boosting a black string charged under a 1-form. Finite boosts of sub-extremal black strings remain sub-extremal black holes after dimensional reduction. Infinite boosts yield the extremal KK charged black hole, whereas finite boosts of extremal black strings map out the remaining extremal black holes with both charges nonzero.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Boosting a black string charged under a 2-form. Here, the extremal black string is invariant under boosts, and instead extremal black holes in the dimensionally reduced theory come from maximally boosting while simultaneously taking r + → r -. Interestingly, the extremality condition takes the form of a linear relation M ≥ c F | Q F | + c H | Q H | rather than a quadratic one.
Figure 2 Boosting a black string charged under a 2-form. Here, the extremal black string is invariant under boosts, and instead extremal black holes in the dimensionally reduced theory come from maximally boosting while simultaneously taking r + → r -. Interestingly, the extremality condition takes the form of a linear relation M ≥ c F | Q F | + c H | Q H | rather than a quadratic one.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 Stabilizing the scalars shrinks the black hole region, which becomes ellipsoidal. In the case without a D -dimensional dilaton ( α = 0) the stabilized extremal boundary intersects the unstabilized extremal boundary at four points, whereas with a dilaton ( α > 0), the stabilized extremal boundary lies strictly inside the unstabilized one.
Figure 3 Stabilizing the scalars shrinks the black hole region, which becomes ellipsoidal. In the case without a D -dimensional dilaton ( α = 0) the stabilized extremal boundary intersects the unstabilized extremal boundary at four points, whereas with a dilaton ( α > 0), the stabilized extremal boundary lies strictly inside the unstabilized one.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 The CHC for a theory with a KK U(1) plus another U(1). It is possible for the chargeto-mass vector of every KK mode to obey | ⃗ Z n | ≥ 1 without satisfying the CHC, as shown at left. Instead, the charge-to-mass vectors must be sufficiently large that the line segments connecting them lie outside the unit disk, as shown at right.
Figure 4 The CHC for a theory with a KK U(1) plus another U(1). It is possible for the chargeto-mass vector of every KK mode to obey | ⃗ Z n | ≥ 1 without satisfying the CHC, as shown at left. Instead, the charge-to-mass vectors must be sufficiently large that the line segments connecting them lie outside the unit disk, as shown at right.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. C. Vafa, The string landscape and the swampland, hep-th/0509212 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  2. N. Arkani-Hamed, L. Motl, A. Nicolis and C. Vafa, The string landscape, black holes and gravity as the weakest force, JHEP 06 (2007) 060 [ hep-th/0601001 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. H. Ooguri and C. Vafa, On the geometry of the string landscape and the swampland, Nucl. Phys. B 766 (2007) 21 [ hep-th/0605264 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  4. T. Rudelius, On the possibility of large axion moduli spaces, JCAP 04 (2015) 049 [ arXiv:1409.5793 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  5. T.C. Bachlechner, C. Long and L. McAllister, Planckian axions in string theory, JHEP 12 (2015) 042 [ arXiv:1412.1093 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  6. T. Rudelius, Constraints on axion inflation from the weak gravity conjecture, JCAP 09 (2015) 020 [ arXiv:1503.00795 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  7. T.C. Bachlechner, C. Long and L. McAllister, Planckian axions and the weak gravity conjecture, JHEP 01 (2016) 091 [ arXiv:1503.07853 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  8. A. Hebecker, P. Mangat, F. Rompineve and L.T. Witkowski, Winding out of the swamp: evading the weak gravity conjecture with F-term winding inflation?, Phys. Lett. B 748 (2015) 455 [ arXiv:1503.07912 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  9. J. Brown, W. Cottrell, G. Shiu and P. Soler, On axionic field ranges, loopholes and the weak gravity conjecture, arXiv:1504.00659 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  10. D. Junghans, Large-field inflation with multiple axions and the weak gravity conjecture, arXiv:1504.03566 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  11. B. Heidenreich, M. Reece and T. Rudelius, Weak gravity strongly constrains large-field axion inflation, JHEP 12 (2015) 108 [ arXiv:1506.03447 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  12. E. Palti, On natural inflation and moduli stabilisation in string theory, JHEP 10 (2015) 188 [ arXiv:1508.00009 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  13. T. Banks and L.J. Dixon, Constraints on string vacua with space-time supersymmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 307 (1988) 93 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  14. R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde, D.A. Linde and L. Susskind, Gravity and global symmetries, Phys. Rev. D 52 (1995) 912 [ hep-th/9502069 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  15. L. Susskind, Trouble for remnants, hep-th/9501106 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  16. T. Banks and N. Seiberg, Symmetries and strings in field theory and gravity, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 084019 [ arXiv:1011.5120 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  17. C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Naturalness and the weak gravity conjecture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 051601 [ arXiv:1402.2287 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  18. J. Polchinski, Monopoles, duality and string theory, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 19S1 (2004) 145 [ hep-th/0304042 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  19. Y. Kats, L. Motl and M. Padi, Higher-order corrections to mass-charge relation of extremal black holes, JHEP 12 (2007) 068 [ hep-th/0606100 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  20. G.W. Gibbons, Antigravitating black hole solitons with scalar hair in N = 4 supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 207 (1982) 337 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  21. R.C. Myers and M.J. Perry, Black holes in higher dimensional space-times, Annals Phys. 172 (1986) 304 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  22. G.W. Gibbons and K.-i. Maeda, Black holes and membranes in higher dimensional theories with dilaton fields, Nucl. Phys. B 298 (1988) 741 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  23. D. Garfinkle, G.T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, Charged black holes in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 3140 [Erratum ibid. D 45 (1992) 3888] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  24. G.T. Horowitz and A. Strominger, Black strings and p-branes, Nucl. Phys. B 360 (1991) 197 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  25. J.X. Lu, ADM masses for black strings and p-branes, Phys. Lett. B 313 (1993) 29 [ hep-th/9304159 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  26. M.J. Duff and J.X. Lu, Black and super p-branes in diverse dimensions, Nucl. Phys. B 416 (1994) 301 [ hep-th/9306052 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  27. M.J. Duff, H. Lü and C.N. Pope, The black branes of M-theory, Phys. Lett. B 382 (1996) 73 [ hep-th/9604052 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  28. R.d. Sorkin, Kaluza-Klein monopole, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983) 87 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  29. D.J. Gross and M.J. Perry, Magnetic monopoles in Kaluza-Klein theories, Nucl. Phys. B 226 (1983) 29 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  30. G.T. Horowitz and K. Maeda, Inhomogeneous near extremal black branes, Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 104028 [ hep-th/0201241 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  31. J. Polchinski, String theory. Volume 2: superstring theory and beyond, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2007).
  32. D.N. Page, Classical stability of round and squashed seven spheres in eleven-dimensional supergravity, Phys. Rev. D 28 (1983) 2976 [ INSPIRE ].
  33. D. Marolf, Chern-Simons terms and the three notions of charge, in the proceedings of the International Conference dedicated to the memory of Professor Efim Fradkin, June 5-10, Moscow, Russia (2000), hep-th/0006117 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  34. D.J. Gross, J.A. Harvey, E.J. Martinec and R. Rohm, Heterotic string theory. 1. The free heterotic string, Nucl. Phys. B 256 (1985) 253 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  35. D.J. Gross, J.A. Harvey, E.J. Martinec and R. Rohm, Heterotic string theory. 2. The interacting heterotic string, Nucl. Phys. B 267 (1986) 75 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  36. X.-G. Wen and E. Witten, Electric and magnetic charges in superstring models, Nucl. Phys. B 261 (1985) 651 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  37. N. Arkani-Hamed, H.-C. Cheng, P. Creminelli and L. Randall, Extra natural inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 221302 [ hep-th/0301218 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  38. Y. Hosotani, Dynamical mass generation by compact extra dimensions, Phys. Lett. B 126 (1983) 309 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  39. H.-C. Cheng, K.T. Matchev and M. Schmaltz, Radiative corrections to Kaluza-Klein masses, Phys. Rev. D 66 (2002) 036005 [ hep-ph/0204342 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  40. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and G. Villadoro, Quantum horizons of the standard model landscape, JHEP 06 (2007) 078 [ hep-th/0703067 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  41. S.B. Giddings and A. Strominger, Axion induced topology change in quantum gravity and string theory, Nucl. Phys. B 306 (1988) 890 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  42. K.-M. Lee, Wormholes and Goldstone bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 (1988) 263 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  43. S.B. Giddings and A. Strominger, String wormholes, Phys. Lett. B 230 (1989) 46 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  44. S.R. Coleman and K.-M. Lee, Wormholes made without massless matter fields, Nucl. Phys. B 329 (1990) 387 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  45. L.F. Abbott and M.B. Wise, Wormholes and global symmetries, Nucl. Phys. B 325 (1989) 687 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  46. N. Arkani-Hamed, J. Orgera and J. Polchinski, Euclidean wormholes in string theory, JHEP 12 (2007) 018 [ arXiv:0705.2768 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  47. M. Gutperle and W. Sabra, Instantons and wormholes in Minkowski and (A)dS spaces, Nucl. Phys. B 647 (2002) 344 [ hep-th/0206153 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  48. E. Bergshoeff, A. Collinucci, U. Gran, D. Roest and S. Vandoren, Non-extremal D-instantons, JHEP 10 (2004) 031 [ hep-th/0406038 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  49. E. Bergshoeff, A. Collinucci, U. Gran, D. Roest and S. Vandoren, Non-extremal instantons and wormholes in string theory, Fortsch. Phys. 53 (2005) 990 [ hep-th/0412183 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  50. T. Banks, M. Johnson and A. Shomer, A note on gauge theories coupled to gravity, JHEP 09 (2006) 049 [ hep-th/0606277 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  51. C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Infrared consistency and the weak gravity conjecture, JHEP 12 (2014) 087 [ arXiv:1407.7865 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  52. B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen, Quantum gravity constraints from unitarity and analyticity, arXiv:1509.00851 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  53. Y. Nakayama and Y. Nomura, Weak gravity conjecture in the AdS/CFT correspondence, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 126006 [ arXiv:1509.01647 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv

Cited by

See all 190

Metadata

Authors
Heidenreich, B., Reece, M., & Rudelius, T.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-02
Volume
2016
Issue
2
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep02(2016)140
Cited by
190
References
3
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sharpening the weak gravity conjecture with dimensional reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/jhep02(2016)140
The paper
Heidenreich, B., Reece, M., & Rudelius, T. (2016). Sharpening the weak gravity conjecture with dimensional reduction. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep02(2016)140

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.