Cited by 66Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsCosmology and Gravitation TheoriesNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories

Can gravitational instantons really constrain axion inflation?

Open access
Hebecker, Arthur, Mangat, Patrick, Theisen, Stefan, Witkowski, Lukas T.·2017·Journal of High Energy Physics

Abstract

Axions play a central role in inflationary model building and other cosmological applications. This is mainly due to their flat potential, which is protected by a global shift symmetry. However, quantum gravity is known to break global symmetries, the crucial effect in the present context being gravitational instantons or Giddings-Strominger wormholes. We attempt to quantify, as model-independently as possible, how large a scalar potential is induced by this general quantum gravity effect. We pay particular attention to the crucial issue which solutions can or cannot be trusted in the presence of a moduli-stabilisation and a Kaluza-Klein scale. An important conclusion is that, due to specific numerical prefactors, the effect is surprisingly small even in UV-completions with the highest possible scale offered by string theory. As we go along, we discuss in detail Euclidean wormholes, cored and extremal instantons, and how the latter arise from 5d Reissner-Nordström black holes. We attempt to dispel possible doubts that wormholes contribute to the scalar potential by an explicit calculation. We analyse the role of stabilised dilaton-like moduli. Finally, we argue that Euclidean wormholes may be the objects satisfying the Weak Gravity Conjecture extended to instantons.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep02(2017)097

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are difficulties in making strong, generic arguments against large-field axionic inflation.

    “We review some of this discussion, pointing out in particular difficulties in making strong, generic arguments against large-field axionic inflation (Hebecker et al., 2017).”
  • Taking into account the large numerical prefactor 3π^3/2 and the value Λ_inf^4 ∼ 10^{-8} M_P^4 relevant for phenomenological large field inflation, the inequality (62) is saturated at μ_UV ≃ 2.5 M_P (corresponding to r_n ≃ 0.4 M_P), so even the smallest controlled wormhole solutions appear harmless.

    “However, taking into account the surprisingly large numerical prefactor 3π 3 /2 and the value 4 inf ∼ 10 -8 M P relevant for phenomenological large field inflation, the conclusion changes dramatically.One finds that the inequality (62) is saturated at µ UV ≃ 2.5 M P (corresponding to r n ≃ 0.4M P ).Thus, even the smallest controlled wormhole solutions appear to be harmless (Hebecker et al., 2017).”
  • For effective axions with f > M_P, wormholes could in principle have a sizeable impact in the inflaton potential.

    “For (effective) axions with f > M P , this is relevant in the context of large-field inflation, where wormholes could in principle have a sizeable impact in the inflaton potential (Montero et al., 2015;Hebecker et al., 2017).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hebecker, A., Mangat, P., Theisen, S., & Witkowski, L. T.
Affiliations
  • Heidelberg University (DE)
  • Max Planck Institute for Gravitational Physics (DE)
Corresponding author
Mangat, Patrick
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Published
2017-02
Volume
2017
Issue
2
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2508596512
Cited by
66
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10
FWCI
5.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (TRR 33)
  • Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Keywords
axion inflation, gravitational instantons, quantum gravity, symmetry breaking, scalar potential, moduli stabilization, Kaluza-Klein scale, Euclidean wormholes, Reissner-Nordström black hole, weak gravity conjecture, string theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review