The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Scanning tunneling macroscopy, black holes and AdS/CFT bulk locality
Open accessAbstract
We establish resolution bounds on reconstructing a bulk field from boundary data on a timelike hypersurface. If the bulk only supports propagating modes, reconstruction is complete. If the bulk also supports evanescent modes, local reconstruction is not achievable unless one has exponential precision in knowledge of the boundary data. Without exponential precision, for a Minkowski bulk, one can reconstruct a spatially coarse-grained bulk field, but only out to a depth set by the coarse-graining scale. For an asymptotically AdS bulk, reconstruction is limited to a spatial coarse-graining proper distance set by the AdS scale. AdS black holes admit evanescent modes. We study the resolution bound in the large AdS black hole background and provide a dual CFT interpretation. Our results demonstrate that, if there is a black hole of any size in the bulk, then sub-AdS bulk locality is no longer well-encoded in boundary data in terms of local CFT operators. Specifically, in order to probe the bulk on sub-AdS scales using only boundary data in terms of local operators, one must either have such data to exponential precision or make further assumptions about the bulk state.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“using the WKB approximation for Y and ψ at large λ it is not hard to see that indeed the integral does not converge for any choice of bulk and boundary points [8, 51, 52].”
From Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT (2015) · cites this paper as [52]
In the citing paper
“It was immediately realized, however, that in fact this expression for K is not welldefined [7] (see also [51, 52])”
From Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT (2015) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
Maldacena, J., Michelson, J., & Strominger, A. (1999) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/02/011 · Cited by 548
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- D. Kabat and G. Lifschytz, Decoding the hologram: Scalar fields interacting with gravity, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 066010 [ arXiv:1311.3020 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- I. Heemskerk, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski and J. Sully, Bulk and Transhorizon Measurements in AdS/CFT, JHEP 10 (2012) 165 [ arXiv:1201.3664 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
- V. Rosenhaus, Holography for a small world, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 106004 [ arXiv:1309.4526 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- W.R. Kelly and A.C. Wall, Coarse-grained entropy and causal holographic information in AdS/CFT, JHEP 03 (2014) 118 [ arXiv:1309.3610 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
- N. Lashkari, M.B. McDermott and M. Van Raamsdonk, Gravitational dynamics from entanglement ’thermodynamics’, JHEP 04 (2014) 195 [ arXiv:1308.3716 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
- T. Faulkner, M. Guica, T. Hartman, R.C. Myers and M. Van Raamsdonk, Gravitation from Entanglement in Holographic CFTs, JHEP 03 (2014) 051 [ arXiv:1312.7856 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
- N. Engelhardt and A.C. Wall, Extremal Surface Barriers, JHEP 03 (2014) 068 [ arXiv:1312.3699 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
- V.E. Hubeny and H. Maxfield, Holographic probes of collapsing black holes, JHEP 03 (2014) 097 [ arXiv:1312.6887 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
- V. Balasubramanian, B.D. Chowdhury, B. Czech, J. de Boer and M.P. Heller, A hole-ographic spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 086004 [ arXiv:1310.4204 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- R. Bousso, B. Freivogel, S. Leichenauer, V. Rosenhaus and C. Zukowski, Null Geodesics, Local CFT Operators and AdS/CFT for Subregions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 064057 [ arXiv:1209.4641 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- S. Leichenauer and V. Rosenhaus, AdS black holes, the bulk-boundary dictionary and smearing functions, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 026003 [ arXiv:1304.6821 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- C. Keeler, G. Knodel and J.T. Liu, What do non-relativistic CFTs tell us about Lifshitz spacetimes?, JHEP 01 (2014) 062 [ arXiv:1308.5689 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
- T. Banks, M.R. Douglas, G.T. Horowitz and E.J. Martinec, AdS dynamics from conformal field theory, hep-th/9808016 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Local bulk operators in AdS/CFT: A Boundary view of horizons and locality, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 086003 [ hep-th/0506118 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- A. Hamilton, D.N. Kabat, G. Lifschytz and D.A. Lowe, Holographic representation of local bulk operators, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 066009 [ hep-th/0606141 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- S.-J. Rey and J.-T. Yee, Macroscopic strings as heavy quarks in large-N gauge theory and anti-de Sitter supergravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 22 (2001) 379 [ hep-th/9803001 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
- J.M. Maldacena, Wilson loops in large-N field theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 4859 [ hep-th/9803002 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
- J. Polchinski, L. Susskind and N. Toumbas, Negative energy, superluminosity and holography, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 084006 [ hep-th/9903228 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi, Holographic derivation of entanglement entropy from AdS/CFT, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006) 181602 [ hep-th/0603001 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
- R.M. Wald, General Relativity, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago U.S.A. (1984). · DOI · Paper page
- D.T. Son and A.O. Starinets, Minkowski space correlators in AdS/CFT correspondence: Recipe and applications, JHEP 09 (2002) 042 [ hep-th/0205051 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
- A. Almheiri and J. Polchinski, Models of AdS 2 Backreaction and Holography, arXiv:1402.6334 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
- L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.K. (2012). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bulk locality and quantum error correction in AdS/CFT
Almheiri, A., Dong, X., & Harlow, D. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2015)163 · Cited by 802
Metadata
- Authors
- Rey, S.-J., & Rosenhaus, V.
- Affiliations
- Seoul National University (KR)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Rey, Soo-Jong
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 2014
- Issue
- 7
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051677080
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
- FWCI
- 2.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation
- National Research Foundation of Korea (2012K2A1A9055280, 2005-0093843, 2010-220-C00003)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Electrodynamics and Casimir Effect
- Keywords
- AdS/CFT correspondence, bulk locality, evanescent modes, asymptotically AdS black holes, coarse-graining, timelike hypersurfaces, local operators
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review