The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Backreacted axion field ranges in string theory
Open accessAbstract
String theory axions are interesting candidates for fields whose potential might be controllable over super-Planckian field ranges and therefore as possible candidates for inflatons in large field inflation. Axion monodromy scenarios are setups where the axion shift symmetry is broken by some effect such that the axion can traverse a large number of periods potentially leading to super-Planckian excursions. We study such scenarios in type IIA string theory where the axion shift symmetry is broken by background fluxes. In particular we calculate the backreaction of the energy density induced by the axion vacuum expectation value on its own field space metric. We find universal behaviour for all the compactifications studied where up to a certain critical axion value there is only a small backreaction effect. Beyond the critical value the backreaction is strong and implies that the proper field distance as measured by the backreacted metric increases at best logarithmically with the axion vev, thereby placing strong limitations on extending the field distance any further. The critical axion value can be made arbitrarily large by the choice of fluxes. However the backreaction of these fluxes on the axion field space metric ensures a precise cancellation such that the proper field distance up to the critical axion value is flux independent and remains sub-Planckian. We also study an axion alignment scenario for type IIA compactifications on a twisted torus with four fundamental axions mixing to leave an axion with an effective decay constant which is flux dependent. There is a choice of fluxes for which the alignment parameter controlling the effective decay constant is unconstrained by tadpoles and can in principle lead to an arbitrarily large effective decay constant. However we show that these fluxes backreact on the fundamental decay constants so as to precisely cancel any enhancement leaving a sub-Planckian effective decay constant.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fencing in the Swampland: quantum Gravity Constraints on Large Field Inflation
Brown, J., Cottrell, W., Shiu, G., & Soler, P. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)023 · Cited by 232
Montero, M., Uranga, A. M., & Valenzuela, I. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2015)032 · Cited by 200
On axionic field ranges, loopholes and the weak gravity conjecture
Brown, J., Cottrell, W., Shiu, G., & Soler, P. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2016)017 · Cited by 98
Cited by
The Swampland: Introduction and Review
Palti, E. (2019) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 · Cited by 908
Self-citationLectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications
van Beest, M., Calderón-Infante, J., Mirfendereski, D., & Valenzuela, I. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 · Cited by 336
Lüst, D., Palti, E., & Vafa, C. (2019) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134867 · Cited by 308
Self-citationCan gravitational instantons really constrain axion inflation?
Hebecker, A., Mangat, P., Theisen, S., & Witkowski, L. T. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2017)097 · Cited by 66
Metadata
- Authors
- Baume, F., & Palti, E.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 2016
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2284949904
- Cited by
- 160
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 11.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Backreacted axion field ranges in string theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/jhep08(2016)043
- The paper
- Baume, F., & Palti, E. (2016). Backreacted axion field ranges in string theory. Journal of High Energy Physics. https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep08(2016)043
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.