The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The weak gravity conjecture and scalar fields
Open accessAbstract
We propose a generalisation of the Weak Gravity Conjecture in the presence of scalar fields. The proposal is guided by properties of extremal black holes in $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ supergravity, but can be understood more generally in terms of forbidding towers of stable gravitationally bound states. It amounts to the statement that there must exist a particle on which the gauge force acts more strongly than gravity and the scalar forces combined. We also propose that the scalar force itself should act on this particle stronger than gravity. This implies that generically the mass of this particle decreases exponentially as a function of the scalar field expectation value for super-Planckian variations, which is behaviour predicted by the Refined Swampland Conjecture. In the context of $$ \mathcal{N}=2 $$ supergravity the Weak Gravity Conjecture bound can be tied to bounds on scalar field distances in field space. Guided by this, we present a general proof that for any linear combination of moduli in any Calabi-Yau compactification of string theory the proper field distance grows at best logarithmically with the moduli values for super-Planckian distances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fencing in the Swampland: quantum Gravity Constraints on Large Field Inflation
Brown, J., Cottrell, W., Shiu, G., & Soler, P. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2015)023 · Cited by 232
Montero, M., Uranga, A. M., & Valenzuela, I. (2015) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2015)032 · Cited by 200
Can gravitational instantons really constrain axion inflation?
Hebecker, A., Mangat, P., Theisen, S., & Witkowski, L. T. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2017)097 · Cited by 66
Cited by
The Swampland: Introduction and Review
Palti, E. (2019) · Fortschritte der Physik · doi:10.1002/prop.201900037 · Cited by 908
Self-citationLectures on the Swampland Program in String Compactifications
van Beest, M., Calderón-Infante, J., Mirfendereski, D., & Valenzuela, I. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.09.002 · Cited by 336
Lüst, D., Palti, E., & Vafa, C. (2019) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2019.134867 · Cited by 308
Self-citationNothing is certain in string compactifications
Etxebarria, I. G., Montero, M., Sousa, K., & Valenzuela, I. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2020)032 · Cited by 87
Weak gravity conjecture, multiple point principle and the standard model landscape
Hamada, Y., & Shiu, G. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2017)043 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Palti, E.
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2017-08
- Volume
- 2017
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2613726250
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 14.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.