Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 30

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

New de Sitter solutions in ten dimensions and orientifold singularities

Córdova, Clay, De Luca, G. Bruno, Tomasiello, Alessandro·2020·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep08(2020)093
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

In previous work, we found ten-dimensional solutions to the supergravity equations of motion with a dS 4 factor and O8-planes. We generalize this analysis and obtain other solutions in the same spirit, with an O8+ and an O6−. We examine our original solutions in more detail, focusing in particular on the O8− singularities and on the issues created by their boundary conditions. We also point out some previously known super- symmetric AdS solutions with the same local behavior at their O8− singularity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep08(2020)093

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The function H for O p -planes with p < 7 becomes negative at some value r = r 0 of the radial coordinate. For 3 < p < 7, curvature and string coupling become strong already for larger values of r , in a region schematically shown in red here.
Figure 1 The function H for O p -planes with p < 7 becomes negative at some value r = r 0 of the radial coordinate. For 3 < p < 7, curvature and string coupling become strong already for larger values of r , in a region schematically shown in red here.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 A numerical dS 4 solution. It starts from an O8 + -plane (on the left) and ends at the boundary of the hole produced by an O6 --plane (on the right). The functions are e 4 W (turquoise), e 4 φ (black), e 2 λ 3 (orange, dashed) and e 2 λ 2 (red, dashed). On the right, the functions behave as in equation (3.33). The numerical constants that produce the solution in this plot are Λ = 2 . 7 × 10 -3 , κ 3 = -2 . 1 × 10 -1 , a 1 = 9 . 02, a 2 = 3 . 5 × 10 2 , q 0 = -2 . 86, N = -275 and n 0 = -4.
Figure 2 A numerical dS 4 solution. It starts from an O8 + -plane (on the left) and ends at the boundary of the hole produced by an O6 --plane (on the right). The functions are e 4 W (turquoise), e 4 φ (black), e 2 λ 3 (orange, dashed) and e 2 λ 2 (red, dashed). On the right, the functions behave as in equation (3.33). The numerical constants that produce the solution in this plot are Λ = 2 . 7 × 10 -3 , κ 3 = -2 . 1 × 10 -1 , a 1 = 9 . 02, a 2 = 3 . 5 × 10 2 , q 0 = -2 . 86, N = -275 and n 0 = -4.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 A solution with t = -1 4 , σ = -4, F 0 = -4 2 π , and L = 8. The plotted functions are e W (orange), e φ (black) and e λ 1 (turquoise). On the left ( x 0 = -0 . 38) the S 1 shrinks regularly, on the right ( x = 0) a diverging-dilaton O8 sits.
Figure 3 A solution with t = -1 4 , σ = -4, F 0 = -4 2 π , and L = 8. The plotted functions are e W (orange), e φ (black) and e λ 1 (turquoise). On the left ( x 0 = -0 . 38) the S 1 shrinks regularly, on the right ( x = 0) a diverging-dilaton O8 sits.CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. B. de Wit, D.J. Smit and N.D. Hari Dass, Residual supersymmetry of compactified D = 10 supergravity, Nucl. Phys. B 283 (1987) 165 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  2. J.M. Maldacena and C. Núñez, Supergravity description of field theories on curved manifolds and a no go theorem, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16 (2001) 822 [hep-th/0007018] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. S. Kachru, R. Kallosh, A.D. Linde and S.P. Trivedi, De Sitter vacua in string theory, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003) 046005 [hep-th/0301240] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  4. V. Balasubramanian, P. Berglund, J.P. Conlon and F. Quevedo, Systematics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi- Yau flux compactifications, JHEP 03 (2005) 007 [hep-th/0502058] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  5. E. Silverstein, Simple de Sitter solutions, Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 106006 [arXiv :0712.1196] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  6. C. Caviezel, P. Koerber, S. Körs, D. Lüst, T. Wrase and M. Zagermann, On the cosmology of type IIA compactifications on SU(3)-structure manifolds, JHEP 04 (2009) 010 [arXiv:0812.3551] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  7. U.H. Danielsson, P. Koerber and T. Van Riet, Universal de Sitter solutions at tree-level, JHEP 05 (2010) 090 [arXiv:1003.3590] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  8. X. Dong, B. Horn, E. Silverstein and G. Torroba, Micromanaging de Sitter holography, Class. Quant. Grav. 27 (2010) 245020 [arXiv:1005.5403] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  9. J. Blaback, U.H. Danielsson, D. Junghans, T. Van Riet, T. Wrase and M. Zagermann, The problematic backreaction of SUSY-breaking branes, JHEP 08 (2011) 105 [arXiv:1105.4879] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  10. I. Bena, M. Graña and N. Halmagyi, On the existence of meta-stable vacua in Klebanov-Strassler, JHEP 09 (2010) 087 [arXiv:0912.3519] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  11. T. Banks, The top 10500 reasons not to believe in the landscape, arXiv:1208.5715 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  12. S. Sethi, Supersymmetry breaking by fluxes, JHEP 10 (2018) 022 [arXiv:1709.03554] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  13. U.H. Danielsson and T. Van Riet, What if string theory has no de Sitter vacua?, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 27 (2018) 1830007 [arXiv:1804.01120] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  14. G. Obied, H. Ooguri, L. Spodyneiko and C. Vafa, De Sitter space and the Swampland, arXiv:1806.08362 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  15. D. Andriot, On the de Sitter Swampland criterion, Phys. Lett. B 785 (2018) 570 [arXiv:1806.10999] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  16. F. Denef, A. Hebecker and T. Wrase, De Sitter Swampland conjecture and the Higgs potential, Phys. Rev. D 98 (2018) 086004 [arXiv:1807.06581] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  17. S.K. Garg and C. Krishnan, Bounds on slow roll and the de Sitter Swampland, JHEP 11 (2019) 075 [arXiv:1807.05193] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  18. H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa, Distance and de Sitter conjectures on the Swampland, Phys. Lett. B 788 (2019) 180 [arXiv:1810.05506] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  19. D. Andriot, Open problems on classical de Sitter solutions, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1900026 [arXiv:1902.10093] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  20. S. Kachru and S.P. Trivedi, A comment on effective field theories of flux vacua, Fortsch. Phys. 67 (2019) 1800086 [arXiv:1808.08971] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  21. S. Das, S.S. Haque and B. Underwood, Constraints and horizons for de Sitter with extra dimensions, Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019) 046013 [arXiv:1905.05864] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  22. C. Córdova, G.B. De Luca and A. Tomasiello, Classical de Sitter solutions of 10-dimensional supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) 091601 [arXiv:1812.04147] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  23. N. Seiberg and E. Witten, Gauge dynamics and compactification to three-dimensions, talk given at the Conference on the Mathematical Beauty of Physics (In Memory of C. Itzykson), June 5–7, Saclay, France (1996), hep-th/9607163 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv
  24. A. Hanany and B. Pioline, (Anti-)instantons and the Atiyah-Hitchin manifold, JHEP 07 (2000) 001 [hep-th/0005160] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  25. A. Passias, A. Rota and A. Tomasiello, Universal consistent truncation for 6d/7d gauge/gravity duals, JHEP 10 (2015) 187 [arXiv:1506.05462] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  26. F. Apruzzi, M. Fazzi, D. Rosa and A. Tomasiello, All AdS7 solutions of type-II supergravity, JHEP 04 (2014) 064 [arXiv:1309.2949] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  27. F. Apruzzi and M. Fazzi, AdS7 /CFT6 with orientifolds, JHEP 01 (2018) 124 [arXiv:1712.03235] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  28. N. Cribiori and D. Junghans, No classical (anti-)de Sitter solutions with O8-planes, Phys. Lett. B 793 (2019) 54 [arXiv:1902.08209] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  29. A. Passias, D. Prins and A. Tomasiello, A massive class of $$ \mathcal{N} $$ = 2 AdS4 IIA solutions, JHEP 10 (2018) 071 [arXiv:1805.03661] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  30. A. Brandhuber and Y. Oz, The D4-D8 brane system and five-dimensional fixed points, Phys. Lett. B 460 (1999) 307 [hep-th/9905148] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  31. I. Bah, A. Passias and A. Tomasiello, AdS5 compactifications with punctures in massive IIA supergravity, JHEP 11 (2017) 050 [arXiv:1704.07389] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  32. G. Dibitetto, G. Lo Monaco, A. Passias, N. Petri and A. Tomasiello, AdS3 solutions with exceptional supersymmetry, Fortsch. Phys. 66 (2018) 1800060 [arXiv:1807.06602] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  33. G. Dibitetto and A. Passias, AdS2 × S7 solutions from D0-F1-D8 intersections, JHEP 10 (2018) 190 [arXiv:1807.00555] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  34. C. C´ordova, G. De Luca and A. Tomasiello, AdS8 solutions in type II supergravity, JHEP 07 (2019) 127 [arXiv:1811.06987] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  35. A. Sen, Orientifold limit of F-theory vacua, Phys. Rev. D 55 (1997) 7345 [hep-th/9702165] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  36. G.W. Gibbons, G.T. Horowitz and P.K. Townsend, Higher dimensional resolution of dilatonic black hole singularities, Class. Quant. Grav. 12 (1995) 297 [hep-th/9410073] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  37. E. Witten, Toroidal compactification without vector structure, JHEP 02 (1998) 006 [hep-th/9712028] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  38. M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi and A. Sagnotti, Toroidal compactification and symmetry breaking in open string theories, Nucl. Phys. B 376 (1992) 365 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  39. C. Angelantonj, M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi, A. Sagnotti and Y.S. Stanev, Comments on Gepner models and type-I vacua in string theory, Phys. Lett. B 387 (1996) 743 [hep-th/9607229] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  40. F. Apruzzi, M. Fazzi, A. Passias, A. Rota and A. Tomasiello, Six-dimensional superconformal theories and their compactifications from type IIA supergravity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 (2015) 061601 [arXiv:1502.06616] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  41. S. Cremonesi and A. Tomasiello, 6d holographic anomaly match as a continuum limit, JHEP 05 (2016) 031 [arXiv:1512.02225] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  42. A. Rota and A. Tomasiello, AdS4 compactifications of AdS7 solutions in type-II supergravity, JHEP 07 (2015) 076 [arXiv:1502.06622] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  43. C. Cordova, T.T. Dumitrescu and K. Intriligator, Anomalies, renormalization group flows and the a-theorem in six-dimensional (1, 0) theories, JHEP 10 (2016) 080 [arXiv:1506.03807] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  44. F.F. Gautason, D. Junghans and M. Zagermann, Cosmological constant, near brane behavior and singularities, JHEP 09 (2013) 123 [arXiv:1301.5647] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  45. R. Steinbauer and J.A. Vickers, The Use of generalised functions and distributions in general relativity, Class. Quant. Grav. 23 (2006) R91 [gr-qc/0603078] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  46. A. Passias and P. Richmond, Perturbing AdS6 ×w S4 : linearised equations and spin-2 spectrum, JHEP 07 (2018) 058 [arXiv:1804.09728] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  47. D. Andriot and D. Tsimpis, Gravitational waves in warped compactifications, JHEP 06 (2020) 100 [arXiv:1911.01444] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  48. N. Dorey, V.V. Khoze, M.P. Mattis, D. Tong and S. Vandoren, Instantons, three-dimensional gauge theory and the Atiyah-Hitchin manifold, Nucl. Phys. B 502 (1997) 59 [hep-th/9703228] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  49. M.F. Atiyah and N.J. Hitchin, Low-energy scattering of nonabelian monopoles, Phys. Lett. A 107 (1985) 21 [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  50. F. Saracco, A. Tomasiello and G. Torroba, Topological resolution of gauge theory singularities, Phys. Rev. D 88 (2013) 045018 [arXiv:1305.2929] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  51. F. Saracco and A. Tomasiello, Localized O6-plane solutions with Romans mass, JHEP 07 (2012) 077 [arXiv:1201.5378] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  52. B. Michel, E. Mintun, J. Polchinski, A. Puhm and P. Saad, Remarks on brane and antibrane dynamics, JHEP 09 (2015) 021 [arXiv:1412.5702] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  53. H. Balasin and H. Nachbagauer, The energy-momentum tensor of a black hole, or what curves the Schwarzschild geometry?, Class. Quant. Grav. 10 (1993) 2271 [gr-qc/9305009] [INSPIRE]. · DOI · Paper page
  54. H. Balasin and H. Nachbagauer, Distributional energy momentum tensor of the Kerr-Newman space-time family, Class. Quant. Grav. 11 (1994) 1453 [gr-qc/9312028] [INSPIRE]. · DOI
  55. G. Compère and A. Fiorucci, Advanced lectures on general relativity, arXiv:1801.07064 [INSPIRE]. · arXiv

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Córdova, C., De Luca, G. B., & Tomasiello, A.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-08
Volume
2020
Issue
8
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep08(2020)093
Cited by
30
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.