Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modular Hamiltonians for deformed half-spaces and the averaged null energy condition

Faulkner, Thomas, Leigh, Robert G., Parrikar, Onkar, Wang, Huajia·2016·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep09(2016)038
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep09(2016)038

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 We deform the half space A 0 (solid blue line) inwards into the region A (solid red line), such that D ( A ) (darker shaded region) is contained inside D ( A 0 ) (lighter shaded region). Also shown are the Rindler horizons H ± corresponding to the regions A 0 and A c 0 . (The transverse directions ⃗ x are implicit.)
Figure 1 We deform the half space A 0 (solid blue line) inwards into the region A (solid red line), such that D ( A ) (darker shaded region) is contained inside D ( A 0 ) (lighter shaded region). Also shown are the Rindler horizons H ± corresponding to the regions A 0 and A c 0 . (The transverse directions ⃗ x are implicit.)CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 The path integral construction for matrix elements of the reduced density matrix for the state | ψ α 〉 , over the original half space A 0 (solid blue line). The operator insertions are marked at x 0 E = ± τ . The black dot is the entangling surface (with transverse directions ⃗ x implicit).
Figure 2 The path integral construction for matrix elements of the reduced density matrix for the state | ψ α 〉 , over the original half space A 0 (solid blue line). The operator insertions are marked at x 0 E = ± τ . The black dot is the entangling surface (with transverse directions ⃗ x implicit).CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 3 We split the region of integration into two parts: the region inside the dotted line is R b , and the region outside is ˜ R . Also shown is the brach-cut ∂ ˜ R ± .
Figure 3 We split the region of integration into two parts: the region inside the dotted line is R b , and the region outside is ˜ R . Also shown is the brach-cut ∂ ˜ R ± .CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 4 The contribution from inside the region R b can be written in real time as an integral over the shaded region.
Figure 4 The contribution from inside the region R b can be written in real time as an integral over the shaded region.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 5 The path integral construction of the regulated reduced density matrix for an excited state. We cut out a cylindrical region of radius r = a around the entangling surface, with brickwall-like boundary conditions. Also shown is the fictitious cutoff surface of radius r = b .
Figure 5 The path integral construction of the regulated reduced density matrix for an excited state. We cut out a cylindrical region of radius r = a around the entangling surface, with brickwall-like boundary conditions. Also shown is the fictitious cutoff surface of radius r = b .CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. J.J. Bisognano and E.H. Wichmann, On the duality condition for quantum fields, J. Math. Phys. 17 (1976) 303 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  2. H. Casini, M. Huerta and R.C. Myers, Towards a derivation of holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2011) 036 [ arXiv:1102.0440 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  3. R. Bousso, H. Casini, Z. Fisher and J. Maldacena, Proof of a quantum Bousso bound, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 044002 [ arXiv:1404.5635 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  4. R. Bousso, H. Casini, Z. Fisher and J. Maldacena, Entropy on a null surface for interacting quantum field theories and the Bousso bound, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 084030 [ arXiv:1406.4545 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  5. D.L. Jafferis and S.J. Suh, The gravity duals of modular hamiltonians, arXiv:1412.8465 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  6. T. Faulkner, R.G. Leigh and O. Parrikar, Shape dependence of entanglement entropy in conformal field theories, JHEP 04 (2016) 088 [ arXiv:1511.05179 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  7. V. Rosenhaus and M. Smolkin, Entanglement entropy: a perturbative calculation, JHEP 12 (2014) 179 [ arXiv:1403.3733 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  8. V. Rosenhaus and M. Smolkin, Entanglement entropy for relevant and geometric perturbations, JHEP 02 (2015) 015 [ arXiv:1410.6530 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  9. A. Allais and M. Mezei, Some results on the shape dependence of entanglement and Rényi entropies, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 046002 [ arXiv:1407.7249 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  10. M. Mezei, Entanglement entropy across a deformed sphere, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 045038 [ arXiv:1411.7011 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  11. T. Faulkner, Bulk emergence and the RG flow of entanglement entropy, JHEP 05 (2015) 033 [ arXiv:1412.5648 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  12. H. Casini and M. Huerta, A finite entanglement entropy and the c-theorem, Phys. Lett. B 600 (2004) 142 [ hep-th/0405111 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  13. H. Casini and M. Huerta, On the RG running of the entanglement entropy of a circle, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 125016 [ arXiv:1202.5650 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  14. H. Casini, Relative entropy and the Bekenstein bound, Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 205021 [ arXiv:0804.2182 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  15. A.C. Wall, A proof of the generalized second law for rapidly changing fields and arbitrary horizon slices, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 104049 [ arXiv:1105.3445 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  16. N. Lashkari, C. Rabideau, P. Sabella-Garnier and M. Van Raamsdonk, Inviolable energy conditions from entanglement inequalities, JHEP 06 (2015) 067 [ arXiv:1412.3514 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  17. N. Lashkari, J. Lin, H. Ooguri, B. Stoica and M. Van Raamsdonk, Gravitational positive energy theorems from information inequalities, arXiv:1605.01075 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  18. S. Banerjee, A. Bhattacharyya, A. Kaviraj, K. Sen and A. Sinha, Constraining gravity using entanglement in AdS/CFT, JHEP 05 (2014) 029 [ arXiv:1401.5089 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  19. A. Bhattacharyya, L. Cheng and L.-Y. Hung, Relative entropy, mixed gauge-gravitational anomaly and causality, JHEP 07 (2016) 121 [ arXiv:1605.02553 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  20. D.D. Blanco and H. Casini, Localization of negative energy and the Bekenstein bound, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 221601 [ arXiv:1309.1121 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  21. A. Borde, Geodesic focusing, energy conditions and singularities, Class. Quant. Grav. 4 (1987) 343 [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  22. F.J. Tipler, Energy conditions and spacetime singularities, Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 2521 [ INSPIRE ].
  23. J.L. Friedman, K. Schleich and D.M. Witt, Topological censorship, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 1486 [Erratum ibid. 75 (1995) 1872] [ gr-qc/9305017 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  24. C.J. Fewster, Lectures on quantum energy inequalities, arXiv:1208.5399 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  25. R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Quantum focusing conjecture, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 064044 [ arXiv:1506.02669 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  26. R. Bousso, Z. Fisher, J. Koeller, S. Leichenauer and A.C. Wall, Proof of the quantum null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 024017 [ arXiv:1509.02542 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  27. J. Koeller and S. Leichenauer, Holographic proof of the quantum null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 024026 [ arXiv:1512.06109 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  28. G. Klinkhammer, Averaged energy conditions for free scalar fields in flat space-times, Phys. Rev. D 43 (1991) 2542 [ INSPIRE ].
  29. A. Folacci, Averaged null energy condition for electromagnetism in Minkowski space-time, Phys. Rev. D 46 (1992) 2726 [ INSPIRE ].
  30. R. Verch, The averaged null energy condition for general quantum field theories in two-dimensions, J. Math. Phys. 41 (2000) 206 [ math-ph/9904036 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  31. W.R. Kelly and A.C. Wall, Holographic proof of the averaged null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) 106003 [ arXiv:1408.3566 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  32. D.M. Hofman, Higher derivative gravity, causality and positivity of energy in a UV complete QFT, Nucl. Phys. B 823 (2009) 174 [ arXiv:0907.1625 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  33. N. Graham and K.D. Olum, Achronal averaged null energy condition, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 064001 [ arXiv:0705.3193 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  34. E.-A. Kontou and K.D. Olum, Proof of the averaged null energy condition in a classical curved spacetime using a null-projected quantum inequality, Phys. Rev. D 92 (2015) 124009 [ arXiv:1507.00297 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  35. D.M. Hofman and J. Maldacena, Conformal collider physics: energy and charge correlations, JHEP 05 (2008) 012 [ arXiv:0803.1467 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  36. M. Kulaxizi and A. Parnachev, Energy flux positivity and unitarity in CFTs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 (2011) 011601 [ arXiv:1007.0553 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  37. Z. Komargodski, M. Kulaxizi, A. Parnachev and A. Zhiboedov, Conformal field theories and deep inelastic scattering, arXiv:1601.05453 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  38. D.M. Hofman, D. Li, D. Meltzer, D. Poland and F. Rejon-Barrera, A proof of the conformal collider bounds, JHEP 06 (2016) 111 [ arXiv:1603.03771 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  39. T. Hartman, S. Jain and S. Kundu, A new spin on causality constraints, arXiv:1601.07904 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  40. T. Hartman, S. Jain and S. Kundu, Causality constraints in conformal field theory, JHEP 05 (2016) 099 [ arXiv:1509.00014 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  41. X.O. Camanho and J.D. Edelstein, Causality constraints in AdS/CFT from conformal collider physics and Gauss-Bonnet gravity, JHEP 04 (2010) 007 [ arXiv:0911.3160 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  42. A. Buchel, J. Escobedo, R.C. Myers, M.F. Paulos, A. Sinha and M. Smolkin, Holographic GB gravity in arbitrary dimensions, JHEP 03 (2010) 111 [ arXiv:0911.4257 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  43. H. Araki, Relative entropy of states of von neumann algebras, Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 11 (1976) 809. · DOI
  44. R. Haag, Local quantum physics: fields, particles, algebras, Springer, Germany (2012).
  45. S. Banerjee, Wess-Zumino consistency condition for entanglement entropy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 (2012) 010402 [ arXiv:1109.5672 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  46. A.C. Wall, Proving the achronal averaged null energy condition from the generalized second law, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010) 024038 [ arXiv:0910.5751 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  47. N. Lashkari, Relative entropies in conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113 (2014) 051602 [ arXiv:1404.3216 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  48. N. Lashkari, Modular Hamiltonian for excited states in conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 041601 [ arXiv:1508.03506 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  49. G. Sárosi and T. Ugajin, Relative entropy of excited states in two dimensional conformal field theories, JHEP 07 (2016) 114 [ arXiv:1603.03057 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  50. T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena, Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy, JHEP 11 (2013) 074 [ arXiv:1307.2892 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  51. X. Dong, D. Harlow and A.C. Wall, Reconstruction of bulk operators within the entanglement wedge in gauge-gravity duality, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016) 021601 [ arXiv:1601.05416 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI · Paper page
  52. W.R. Kelly, K. Kuns and D. Marolf, ’t Hooft suppression and holographic entropy, JHEP 10 (2015) 059 [ arXiv:1507.03654 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  53. F.W.J. Olver eds., NIST handbook of mathematical functions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. (2010).
  54. P. Calabrese and J.L. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 0406 (2004) P06002 [ hep-th/0405152 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  55. W. Bunting, Z. Fu and D. Marolf, A coarse-grained generalized second law for holographic conformal field theories, Class. Quant. Grav. 33 (2016) 055008 [ arXiv:1509.00074 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  56. J. Bhattacharya, V.E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi, Entanglement density and gravitational thermodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 106009 [ arXiv:1412.5472 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  57. H. Casini, M. Huerta, R.C. Myers and A. Yale, Mutual information and the F-theorem, JHEP 10 (2015) 003 [ arXiv:1506.06195 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  58. H. Liu and M. Mezei, A refinement of entanglement entropy and the number of degrees of freedom, JHEP 04 (2013) 062 [ arXiv:1202.2070 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  59. T. Grover, A.M. Turner and A. Vishwanath, Entanglement entropy of gapped phases and topological order in three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011) 195120 [ arXiv:1108.4038 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  60. K. Ohmori and Y. Tachikawa, Physics at the entangling surface, J. Stat. Mech. 1504 (2015) P04010 [ arXiv:1406.4167 ]. · arXiv
  61. H. Casini, M. Huerta and J.A. Rosabal, Remarks on entanglement entropy for gauge fields, Phys. Rev. D 89 (2014) 085012 [ arXiv:1312.1183 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  62. W. Donnelly and A.C. Wall, Entanglement entropy of electromagnetic edge modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 111603 [ arXiv:1412.1895 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  63. W. Donnelly and A.C. Wall, Geometric entropy and edge modes of the electromagnetic field, arXiv:1506.05792 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  64. A. Castro, S. Detournay, N. Iqbal and E. Perlmutter, Holographic entanglement entropy and gravitational anomalies, JHEP 07 (2014) 114 [ arXiv:1405.2792 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  65. N. Iqbal and A.C. Wall, Anomalies of the entanglement entropy in chiral theories, arXiv:1509.04325 [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv
  66. T. Nishioka and A. Yarom, Anomalies and entanglement entropy, JHEP 03 (2016) 077 [ arXiv:1509.04288 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · DOI
  67. T.L. Hughes, R.G. Leigh, O. Parrikar and S.T. Ramamurthy, Entanglement entropy and anomaly inflow, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 065059 [ arXiv:1509.04969 ] [ INSPIRE ]. · arXiv

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Faulkner, T., Leigh, R. G., Parrikar, O., & Wang, H.
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2016-09
Volume
2016
Issue
9
ISSN
1029-8479
DOI
10.1007/jhep09(2016)038
Cited by
230
References
13
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.