Models of AdS2 backreaction and holography
Open accessAbstract
We develop models of 1+1 dimensional dilaton gravity describing flows to AdS2 from higher dimensional AdS and other spaces. We use these to study the effects of backreaction on holographic correlators. We show that this scales as a relevant effect at low energies, for compact transverse spaces. We also discuss effects of matter loops, as in the CGHS model.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Both the SYK model and simple nearly-AdS2 gravity theories such as Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity have an emergent reparameterisation symmetry that is both spontaneously and explicitly broken, with explicit symmetry-breaking term proportional to the Schwarzian action.
“Although the precise dual gravity description, if one exists, remain unknown, both the SYK model and simple nearly-AdS 2 JHEP09(2020)002 gravity theories such as Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity [73, 95-98] have an emergent reparameterisation symmetry that is both spontaneously and explicitly broken, with the explicit symmetry-breaking term proportional to the so-called Schwarzian action”
From Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox (2020) · cites this paper as [95]
For conformal classical matter, the dilaton solution is given by (2.44) with chiral functions.
“The solution with conformal classical matter, for which and by energy conservation and are chiral functions as denoted, is given by (Almheiri and Polchinski 2015)2.44”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Almheiri and Polchinski 2015
The non-zero component of the quantum matter stress tensor leads in the classical equation of motion to a simple shift in the dilaton, with no influence on the boundary equation of motion at the boundary.
“(1) The non-zero component leads in the classical equation of motion to a simple shift in the dilaton (Almheiri and Polchinski 2015), which has no influence on the boundary equation of motion at .”
From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Almheiri and Polchinski 2015
Cites
Callan, C. G., Giddings, S. B., Harvey, J. A., & Strominger, A. (1992) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.45.r1005 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
Vacuum states for <i>AdS</i><sub>2</sub> black holes
Spradlin, M., & Strominger, A. (1999) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1088/1126-6708/1999/11/021 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Conformal symmetry and its breaking in two-dimensional nearly anti-de Sitter space
Maldacena, J., Stanford, D., & Yang, Z. (2016) · Progress of Theoretical and Experimental Physics · doi:10.1093/ptep/ptw124 · Cited by 1,068 · see citing works
Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox
Penington, G. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2020)002 · Cited by 968 · see citing works
“Although the precise dual gravity description, if one exists, remain unknown, both the SYK model and simple nearly-AdS2 gravity theories such as Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity [73, 94–97] have an emergent reparameterisation symmetry that is both spontaneously and explicitly broken, with the explicit symmetry-breaking term…”
BackgroundReplica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation
Almheiri, A., Hartman, T., Maldacena, J., Shaghoulian, E., & Tajdini, A. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)013 · Cited by 910 · see citing works
“We will discuss the saddles explicitly only in some simple examples related to the information paradox for eternal black holes in two-dimensional Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) gravity [25–27], reviewed below, but we can nonetheless compute the effect on the fine-grained entropy more generally.”
BackgroundSelf-citationReplica wormholes and the black hole interior
Penington, G., Shenker, S. H., Stanford, D., & Yang, Z. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.11977 · Cited by 809
The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole
Almheiri, A., Engelhardt, N., Marolf, D., & Maxfield, H. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep12(2019)063 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Self-citationReplica wormholes and the black hole interior
Penington, G., Shenker, S. H., Stanford, D., & Yang, Z. (2022) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep03(2022)205 · Cited by 807 · see citing works
Jensen, K. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.111601 · Cited by 695 · see citing works
An investigation of AdS2 backreaction and holography
Engelsöy, J., Mertens, T. G., & Verlinde, H. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2016)139 · Cited by 622 · see citing works
Black holes and random matrices
Cotler, J. S., Gur-Ari, G., Hanada, M., Polchinski, J., Saad, P., Shenker, S. H., Stanford, D., Streicher, A., & Tezuka, M. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2017)118 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Self-citationFermionic localization of the schwarzian theory
Stanford, D., & Witten, E. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2017)008 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Solving the Schwarzian via the conformal bootstrap
Mertens, T. G., Turiaci, G. J., & Verlinde, H. L. (2017) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2017)136 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Spectral and thermodynamic properties of the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model
García-García, A. M., & Verbaarschot, J. J. M. (2016) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.126010 · Cited by 325 · see citing works
The factorization problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity
Harlow, D., & Jafferis, D. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep02(2020)177 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
On the dynamics of near-extremal black holes
Nayak, P., Shukla, A., Soni, R. M., Trivedi, S. P., & Vishal, V. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep09(2018)048 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
Two dimensional nearly de Sitter gravity
Maldacena, J., Turiaci, G. J., & Yang, Z. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2021)139 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
The statistical mechanics of near-extremal black holes
Iliesiu, L. V., & Turiaci, G. J. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2021)145 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity
Mertens, T. G., & Turiaci, G. J. (2023) · Living Reviews in Relativity · doi:10.1007/s41114-023-00046-1 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Islands and Page curves for evaporating black holes in JT gravity
Hollowood, T. J., & Kumar, S. P. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)094 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Conformal symmetry breaking and thermodynamics of near-extremal black holes
Almheiri, A., & Kang, B. (2016) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2016)052 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Self-citationA universal Schwarzian sector in two-dimensional conformal field theories
Ghosh, A., Maxfield, H., & Turiaci, G. J. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep05(2020)104 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Liouville quantum gravity — holography, JT and matrices
Mertens, T. G., & Turiaci, G. J. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2021)073 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Evaporating black holes coupled to a thermal bath
Chen, H. Z., Fisher, Z., Hernandez, J., Myers, R. C., & Ruan, S.-M. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep01(2021)065 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Replica wormholes for an evaporating 2D black hole
Goto, K., Hartman, T., & Tajdini, A. (2021) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2021)289 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“Then the general solution of these equations is [53]”
BackgroundComplexity of Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity
Brown, A. R., Gharibyan, H., Lin, H. W., Susskind, L., Thorlacius, L., & Zhao, Y. (2019) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.99.046016 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
2D dilaton-gravity, deformations of the minimal string, and matrix models
Turiaci, G. J., Usatyuk, M., & Weng, W. W. (2021) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/1361-6382/ac25df · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Does the SYK model have a spin glass phase?
Gur-Ari, G., Mahajan, R., & Vaezi, A. (2018) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep11(2018)070 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Multi-boundary correlators in JT gravity
Okuyama, K., & Sakai, K. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep08(2020)126 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
Matrix ensembles with global symmetries and ’t Hooft anomalies from 2d gauge theory
Kapec, D., Mahajan, R., & Stanford, D. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2020)186 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review
Kibe, T., Mandayam, P., & Mukhopadhyay, A. (2022) · The European Physical Journal C · doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-022-10382-1 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Towards black hole evaporation in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity
Mertens, T. G. (2019) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep07(2019)097 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Jackiw-Teitelboim model coupled to conformal matter in the semi-classical limit
Moitra, U., Sake, S. K., Trivedi, S. P., & Vishal, V. (2020) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep04(2020)199 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Replica symmetry breaking in random matrix model: A toy model of wormhole networks
Okuyama, K. (2020) · Physics Letters B · doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135280 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Islands in non-minimal dilaton gravity: exploring effective theories for black hole evaporation
Wu, C.-H., & Xu, J. (2023) · Journal of High Energy Physics · doi:10.1007/jhep10(2023)094 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Joshi, L. K., Mukhopadhyay, A., & Soloviev, A. (2020) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.066001 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Almheiri, A., & Polchinski, J.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
- Corresponding author
- Polchinski, Joseph
- ORCID
- Almheiri, Ahmed
- Venue
- Journal of High Energy Physics
- Published
- 2015-11
- Volume
- 2015
- Issue
- 11
- ISSN
- 1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2169059779
- Cited by
- 678
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 52 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 77 · 2019: 84 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 58 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 21.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (PHY11- 25915, 0757035, 25915, 1316748)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies
- Keywords
- AdS2, dilaton gravity, backreaction, holography, holographic correlators, 1+1 dimensional gravity, CGHS model, AdS/CFT correspondence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review