CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 206Black Holes and Theoretical PhysicsNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesQuantum chaos and dynamical systems

On the dynamics of near-extremal black holes

Open access
Nayak, Pranjal, Shukla, Ashish, Soni, Ronak M, Trivedi, Sandip P., Vishal, V.·2018·Journal of High Energy Physics
DOI 10.1007/jhep09(2018)048
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

A bstract: We analyse the dynamics of near-extremal Reissner-Nordström black holes in asymptotically four-dimensional Anti de Sitter space (AdS 4 ). We work in the spherically symmetric approximation and study the thermodynamics and the response to a probe scalar field. We find that the behaviour of the system, at low energies and to leading order in our approximations, is well described by the Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) model of gravity. In fact, this behaviour can be understood from symmetry considerations and arises due to the breaking of time reparametrisation invariance. The JT model has been analysed in considerable detail recently and related to the behaviour of the SYK model. Our results indicate that features in these models which arise from symmetry considerations alone are more general and present quite universally in near-extremal black holes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/jhep09(2018)048

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For near-extremal charged black holes in 4d, the boundary condition on the dilaton arises from gluing the AdS throat to the exterior region.

    “For near extremal charged black holes in 4d considered in Sect. 2.1.2, the boundary condition on the dilaton arises from gluing the AdS throat to the exterior region (Almheiri and Kang 2016; Nayak et al. 2018).”

    From Solvable models of quantum black holes: a review on Jackiw–Teitelboim gravity (2023) · cites this paper as Nayak et al. 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Nayak, P., Shukla, A., Soni, R. M., Trivedi, S. P., & Vishal, V.
Affiliations
Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (IN)
Corresponding author
Vishal, V.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2018-09
Volume
2018
Issue
9
ISSN
1029-8479 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1007/jhep09(2018)048
OpenAlex
W2788356420
Cited by
206
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of High Energy Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UKnowledge (University of Kentucky) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation
  • University of Kentucky
  • Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
  • Institut Périmètre de physique théorique
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
Keywords
near-extremal black holes, Reissner-Nordström black hole, AdS4, black hole thermodynamics, Jackiw-Teitelboim model, spherical symmetry, SYK model, emergent gravity, black hole dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review