Cited by 50Historical and modern epidemiology studiesStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Causality in epidemiology

Vineis, Paolo·2003·Sozial- und Präventivmedizin

Abstract

Epidemiology represents an interesting and unique example of cross-fertilization between social and natural sciences. Epidemiology has evolved from a monocausal to a multicausal concept of the "web of causation", thus mimicking a similar and much earlier shift in the social sciences. However, in comparison with the social sciences epidemiology is both more sensitive to underlying biological models (which condition the interpretation of population findings), and more prone to a simplification of the causal pathways. Paradoxically, epidemiology has developed more sophisticated theoretical models for bias and confounding than the social sciences did, but for the practical purpose of identifying single preventable risk factors. Epidemiology makes use more often of study designs that simulate experimentation, than of surveys in the general population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00038-003-1029-7

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vineis, P.
Affiliations
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista (IT)
Corresponding author
Vineis, Paolo
Venue
Sozial- und Präventivmedizin
Published
2003-04
Volume
48
Issue
2
Pages
80-87
ISSN
  • 0303-8408 (ISSN-L)
  • 1420-911X
OpenAlex
W2155544610
Cited by
49
References
11
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sozial- und Präventivmedizin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Historical and modern epidemiology studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
causality, multicausality, confounding, bias, preventable risk factors, causal pathways, experimental design, social sciences and natural sciences, history of epidemiology
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Biological, Models, Theoretical, Population Surveillance, Risk Factors, Epidemiologic Factors, Bias, Causality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review