Cited by 33Cancer, Hypoxia, and MetabolismRadiation Therapy and DosimetryMathematical Biology Tumor Growth

Spatial oxygenation profiles in tumors during normo- and hyperbaric hyperoxia

Thews, Oliver, Vaupel, Peter·2015·Strahlentherapie und Onkologie

Abstract

Background Inspiratory hyperoxia reduces tumor hypoxia, which is responsible for limited radiosensitivity of tumors. However, very little is known about the heterogeneity of intratumoral oxygenation during this supportive treatment. The study analyzes whether local hypoxia is still present during normobaric and hyperbaric inspiratory hyperoxia and whether the addition of CO2 to the inspiratory gas affects the spatial pO2 distribution.Material and methods Tumor oxygenation of experimental DS-sarcomas in rats was assessed by polarographic needle electrodes at 1 and 2 atm (bar) environmental pressure during pure O2 or carbogen (95 % O2 + 5 % CO2) breathing. Up to 320 individual pO2 measurements were performed in a strictly oriented grid resulting in an oxygenation profile in a horizontal tumor layer.Results In the experimental tumors used the oxygenation showed pronounced heterogeneities with closely adjacent hypoxic and oxygenated regions. This heterogeneity was still visible under normobaric hyperoxia where large confluent hypoxic regions were detectable. At 1 atm, the addition of CO2 improved tumor oxygenation significantly (at least in large tumors). At 2 atm, only very small local regions of hypoxia were detected. However, under this condition hypercapnia had no impact on tumor oxygenation.Conclusions The data show that even under hyperbaric hyperoxia, hypoxic regions are detectable despite the average pO2 increased by a factor of 100. The results also clearly indicate that the oxygenation pattern improves disproportionally with increasing environmental pressure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00066-015-0867-6

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thews, O., & Vaupel, P.
Affiliations
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
  • University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
Corresponding author
Thews, Oliver
Venue
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie
Published
2015-07-02
Volume
191
Issue
11
Pages
875-882
ISSN
  • 0179-7158 (ISSN-L)
  • 1439-099X
OpenAlex
W2332566592
Cited by
33
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Strahlentherapie und Onkologie (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth
Keywords
tumor hypoxia, hyperbaric hyperoxia, normobaric hyperoxia, carbogen, hypercapnia, sarcoma, radiosensitization
MeSH terms
Animals, Carcinosarcoma, Hyperbaric Oxygenation, Male, Oxygen, Oxygen Consumption, Tissue Distribution, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review