Cited by 246Genetic Associations and EpidemiologyGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 130 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Regulatory polymorphisms underlying complex disease traits.

Open access
Knight, Julian C.·2005·Journal of Molecular Medicine

Abstract

There is growing evidence that genetic variation plays an important role in the determination of individual susceptibility to complex disease traits. In contrast to coding sequence polymorphisms, where the consequences of non-synonymous variation may be resolved at the level of the protein phenotype, defining specific functional regulatory polymorphisms has proved problematic. This has arisen for a number of reasons, including difficulties with fine mapping due to linkage disequilibrium, together with a paucity of experimental tools to resolve the effects of non-coding sequence variation on gene expression. Recent studies have shown that variation in gene expression is heritable and can be mapped as a quantitative trait. Allele-specific effects on gene expression appear relatively common, typically of modest magnitude and context specific. The role of regulatory polymorphisms in determining susceptibility to a number of complex disease traits is discussed, including variation at the VNTR of INS, encoding insulin, in type 1 diabetes and polymorphism of CTLA4, encoding cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen, in autoimmune disease. Examples where regulatory polymorphisms have been found to play a role in mongenic traits such as factor VII deficiency are discussed, and contrasted with those polymorphisms associated with ischaemic heart disease at the same gene locus. Molecular mechanisms operating in an allele-specific manner at the level of transcription are illustrated, with examples including the role of Duffy binding protein in malaria. The difficulty of resolving specific functional regulatory variants arising from linkage disequilibrium is demonstrated using a number of examples including polymorphism of CCR5, encoding CC chemokine receptor 5, and HIV-1 infection. The importance of understanding haplotypic structure to the design and interpretation of functional assays of putative regulatory variation is highlighted, together with discussion of the strategic use of experimental tools to resolve regulatory polymorphisms at a transcriptional level. A number of examples are discussed including work on the TNF locus which demonstrate biological and experimental context specificity. Regulatory variation may also operate at other levels of control of gene expression and the modulation of splicing at PTPRC, encoding protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor-type C, and of translational efficiency at F12, encoding factor XII, are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00109-004-0603-7

Cites

128 of 128 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 130 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 246

Metadata

Authors
Knight, J. C.
Affiliations
Centre for Human Genetics (GB)
Corresponding author
Knight, Julian C.
Venue
Journal of Molecular Medicine
Published
2004-12-09
Volume
83
Issue
2
Pages
97-109
ISSN
  • 0946-2716 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1440
OpenAlex
W2143162176
Cited by
246
References
130
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 23
FWCI
10.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Molecular Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (074318)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
Keywords
regulatory polymorphisms, complex disease susceptibility, expression quantitative trait loci, allele-specific expression, linkage disequilibrium, type 1 diabetes, CTLA-4, autoimmune disease, factor VII deficiency, ischemic heart disease, Duffy binding protein, malaria, CCR5, HIV-1 infection, transcriptional regulation, splicing regulation, CD45, translation efficiency, F12, heritability of gene expression
MeSH terms
Autoimmune Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Polymorphism, Genetic, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Tumor Necrosis Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review