Cited by 18Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryPsychiatric care and mental health services

Die aktualisierte S3-Leitlinie Schizophrenie: Entwicklungsprozess und ausgewählte Empfehlungen

Hasan, Alkomiet, Falkai, Peter, Lehmann, Isabel, Janssen, Birgit, Wobrock, Thomas, Zielasek, Jürgen, Gaebel, Wolfgang·2020·Der Nervenarzt

Abstract

Schizophrenia is one of the most severe mental diseases and leads to significant personal and social impairments for affected persons. The illness is characterized by frequent relapses, results in increased mortality and is associated with the highest socioeconomic costs of all diseases. Moreover, patients with schizophrenia are often stigmatized in everyday life and also in most treatment settings. In 1998 the first German schizophrenia guidelines were published, followed by the first S3 guidelines for schizophrenia in 2006. The revision process started in 2012 coordinated by the German Association for Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics (DGPPN) and the revised guidelines were published in 2019. The target group for the revised S3 guidelines includes all persons involved in the care of patients with schizophrenia in all sectors of the German healthcare system, including decision makers and insurance funds. Starting with an introduction of the biological, clinical and epidemiological basis of the disorder, recommendations for the diagnostics of schizophrenia, the detection of comorbidities, the use of antipsychotic medication and other somatic procedures, for psychotherapy, psychosocial interventions, handling of special treatment conditions and rehabilitation are made. Finally, recommendations for an evidence-based and optimal coordination within the healthcare system are made, followed by a discussion of the cost-effectiveness of treatment and presentation of strat…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00115-019-00813-y

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasan, A., Falkai, P., Lehmann, I., Janssen, B., Wobrock, T., Zielasek, J., & Gaebel, W.
Affiliations
  • LMU Klinikum (DE)
  • Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie (DE)
  • LVR-Klinik Köln (DE)
  • LVR-Klinik Langenfeld (DE)
  • Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Hasan, Alkomiet
Venue
Der Nervenarzt
Published
2019-10-11
Volume
91
Issue
1
Pages
26-33
ISSN
  • 0028-2804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-0407
OpenAlex
W2980171006
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
de
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Der Nervenarzt (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OPUS (Augsburg University) (submittedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
schizophrenia, S3 guideline, antipsychotic drugs, schizophrenia diagnosis, comorbidities, psychotherapy, psychosocial interventions, rehabilitation, care coordination, cost-effectiveness, interprofessional collaboration, therapeutic relationship, stigma, quality management
MeSH terms
Humans, Psychotherapy, Psychotic Disorders, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review