The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement
Open accessAbstract
More accurate and precise phenotyping strategies are necessary to empower high-resolution linkage mapping and genome-wide association studies and for training genomic selection models in plant improvement. Within this framework, the objective of modern phenotyping is to increase the accuracy, precision and throughput of phenotypic estimation at all levels of biological organization while reducing costs and minimizing labor through automation, remote sensing, improved data integration and experimental design. Much like the efforts to optimize genotyping during the 1980s and 1990s, designing effective phenotyping initiatives today requires multi-faceted collaborations between biologists, computer scientists, statisticians and engineers. Robust phenotyping systems are needed to characterize the full suite of genetic factors that contribute to quantitative phenotypic variation across cells, organs and tissues, developmental stages, years, environments, species and research programs. Next-generation phenotyping generates significantly more data than previously and requires novel data management, access and storage systems, increased use of ontologies to facilitate data integration, and new statistical tools for enhancing experimental design and extracting biologically meaningful signal from environmental and experimental noise. To ensure relevance, the implementation of efficient and informative phenotyping experiments also requires familiarity with diverse germplasm resources, population structures, and target populations of environments. Today, phenotyping is quickly emerging as the major operational bottleneck limiting the power of genetic analysis and genomic prediction. The challenge for the next generation of quantitative geneticists and plant breeders is not only to understand the genetic basis of complex trait variation, but also to use that knowledge to efficiently synthesize twenty-first century crop varieties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis
Schneider, C. A., Rasband, W. S., & Eliceiri, K. W. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089 · Cited by 64,638
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies
Price, A. L., Patterson, N. J., Plenge, R. M., Weinblatt, M. E., Shadick, N. A., & Reich, D. (2006) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1847 · Cited by 10,248
Genome-wide association study of 107 phenotypes in Arabidopsis thaliana inbred lines
Atwell, S., Huang, Y. S., Vilhjálmsson, B. J., Willems, G., Horton, M., Li, Y., Meng, D., Platt, A., Tarone, A. M., Hu, T. T., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08800 · Cited by 1,780
The allelic architecture of human disease genes: common disease-common variant... or not?
Pritchard, J. K. (2002) · Human Molecular Genetics · doi:10.1093/hmg/11.20.2417 · Cited by 711
Metabolomics-assisted breeding: a viable option for crop improvement?
Fernie, A. R., & Schauer, N. (2009) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2008.10.010 · Cited by 550
More genomic resources for less-studied crops.
Varshney, R. K., Glaszmann, J.-C., Leung, H., & Ribaut, J.-M. (2010) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2010.06.007 · Cited by 140
Evaluation of genome-wide selection efficiency in maize nested association mapping populations
Guo, Z., Tucker, D. M., Lu, J., Kishore, V., & Gay, G. (2012) · Theoretical and Applied Genetics · doi:10.1007/s00122-011-1702-9 · Cited by 127
Cited by
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,817
The Sol Genomics Network (SGN)—from genotype to phenotype to breeding
Fernandez-Pozo, N., Menda, N., Edwards, J. D., Saha, S., Tecle, I. Y., Strickler, S. R., Bombarely, A., Fisher-York, T., Pujar, A., Foerster, H., et al. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1195 · Cited by 710
Field Scanalyzer: An automated robotic field phenotyping platform for detailed crop monitoring
Virlet, N., Sabermanesh, K., Sadeghi-Tehran, P., & Hawkesford, M. J. (2016) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp16163 · Cited by 382
Wen, J., Jiang, F., Weng, Y., Sun, M., Shi, X., Zhou, Y., Yu, L., & Wu, Z. (2019) · BMC Plant Biology · doi:10.1186/s12870-019-2008-3 · Cited by 185
Exploring deep learning for complex trait genomic prediction in polyploid outcrossing species
Zingaretti, L. M., Gezan, S. A., Ferrão, L. F. V., Osorio, L. F., Monfort, A., Muñoz, P. R., Whitaker, V. M., & Pérez-Enciso, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2020.00025 · Cited by 159
Metadata
- Authors
- Cobb, J. N., DeClerck, G., Greenberg, A., Clark, R., & McCouch, S.
- Venue
- Theoretical and Applied Genetics
- Published
- 2013-03-08
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 867-887
- ISSN
- 0040-5752 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2242
- OpenAlex
- W2038546252
- Cited by
- 666
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 27.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00122-013-2066-0
- The paper
- Cobb, J. N., DeClerck, G., Greenberg, A., Clark, R., & McCouch, S. (2013). Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype–phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-013-2066-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.