The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MAGIC populations in crops: current status and future prospects
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Inference of Population Structure Using Multilocus Genotype Data
Pritchard, J. K., Stephens, M., & Donnelly, P. (2000) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/155.2.945 · Cited by 33,908
Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 · Cited by 12,558
TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples
Bradbury, P. J., Zhang, Z., Kroon, D. E., Casstevens, T. M., Ramdoss, Y., & Buckler, E. S. (2007) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308 · Cited by 7,759
A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species
Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Sun, Q., Poland, J. A., Kawamoto, K., Buckler, E. S., & Mitchell, S. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019379 · Cited by 6,501
Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination
GREEN, P. J. (1995) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/82.4.711 · Cited by 5,930
R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses
Broman, K. W., Wu, H., Sen, Ś., & Churchill, G. A. (2003) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg112 · Cited by 3,463
Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci.
Zeng, Z. B. (1994) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457 · Cited by 3,182
Haley, C. S., & Knott, S. A. (1992) · Heredity · doi:10.1038/hdy.1992.131 · Cited by 1,991
Field high-throughput phenotyping: the new crop breeding frontier
Araus, J. L., & Cairns, J. E. (2014) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2013.09.008 · Cited by 1,817 · cited 2×
“Automation of phenotyping is an active area of research, with several reviews published recently describing advances in sensors, robotics and imaging which may revolutionize the collection of data for large field trials (Montes et al. 2007; Furbank and Tester 2011; Araus and Cairns 2014 ).”
BackgroundWang, S., Wong, D., Forrest, K., Allen, A., Chao, S., Huang, B. E., Maccaferri, M., Salvi, S., Milner, S. G., Cattivelli, L., et al. (2014) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12183 · Cited by 1,814
Self-citation
Cited by
Hossain, A., Skalicky, M., Brestic, M., Maitra, S., Ashraful Alam, M., Syed, M. A., Hossain, J., Sarkar, S., Saha, S., Bhadra, P., et al. (2021) · Agronomy · doi:10.3390/agronomy11020241 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Huang, B. E., Verbyla, K. L., Verbyla, A. P., Raghavan, C., Singh, V. K., Gaur, P., Leung, H., Varshney, R. K., & Cavanagh, C. R.
- Venue
- Theoretical and Applied Genetics
- Published
- 2015-04-09
- Volume
- 128
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 999-1017
- ISSN
- 0040-5752 (ISSN-L)
- 1432-2242
- OpenAlex
- W2020128789
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 13.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MAGIC populations in crops: current status and future prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s00122-015-2506-0
- The paper
- Huang, B. E., Verbyla, K. L., Verbyla, A. P., Raghavan, C., Singh, V. K., Gaur, P., Leung, H., Varshney, R. K., & Cavanagh, C. R. (2015). MAGIC populations in crops: current status and future prospects. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-015-2506-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
