Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 6,501

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species

Open access
Elshire, Robert J., Glaubitz, Jeffrey C., Sun, Qi, Poland, Jesse A., Kawamoto, Ken, Buckler, Edward S., Mitchell, Sharon E.·2011·PLoS ONE

Abstract

Advances in next generation technologies have driven the costs of DNA sequencing down to the point that genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) is now feasible for high diversity, large genome species. Here, we report a procedure for constructing GBS libraries based on reducing genome complexity with restriction enzymes (REs). This approach is simple, quick, extremely specific, highly reproducible, and may reach important regions of the genome that are inaccessible to sequence capture approaches. By using methylation-sensitive REs, repetitive regions of genomes can be avoided and lower copy regions targeted with two to three fold higher efficiency. This tremendously simplifies computationally challenging alignment problems in species with high levels of genetic diversity. The GBS procedure is demonstrated with maize (IBM) and barley (Oregon Wolfe Barley) recombinant inbred populations where roughly 200,000 and 25,000 sequence tags were mapped, respectively. An advantage in species like barley that lack a complete genome sequence is that a reference map need only be developed around the restriction sites, and this can be done in the process of sample genotyping. In such cases, the consensus of the read clusters across the sequence tagged sites becomes the reference. Alternatively, for kinship analyses in the absence of a reference genome, the sequence tags can simply be treated as dominant markers. Future application of GBS to breeding, conservation, and global species and population surveys may allow plant breeders to conduct genomic selection on a novel germplasm or species without first having to develop any prior molecular tools, or conservation biologists to determine population structure without prior knowledge of the genome or diversity in the species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0019379

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. W-H Li, 1991, Low nucleotide diversity in man., Genetics, 129, 513, 10.1093/genetics/129.2.513 · DOI · Paper page
  2. M Przeworski, 2000, Adjusting the focus on human variation., Trends Genet, 16, 296, 10.1016/S0168-9525(00)02030-8 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Z Zhao, 2006, Nucleotide variation and haplotype diversity in a 10-kb noncoding region in three continental human populations., Genetics, 174, 399, 10.1534/genetics.106.060301 · DOI
  4. MI Tenaillon, 2001, Patterns of DNA sequence polymorphism along chromosome 1 of maize (Zea mays ssp mays L.)., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 98, 9169, 10.1073/pnas.151244298 · DOI · Paper page
  5. J Yan, 2009, Genetic characterization and linkage disequilibrium estimation of a global maize collection using SNP markers., PLoS One, 4, e8451, 10.1371/journal.pone.0008451 · DOI · Paper page
  6. CF Aquadro, 2001, Genome-wide variation in human and fruitfly: a comparison., Curr Opin Genet Dev, 11, 627, 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00245-8 · DOI
  7. SR Gill, 2005, Insights on evolution of virulence and resistance from the complete genome analysis of an early methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain and a biofilm-producing methicillin-resistant Staphlococcus epidermis strain., J Bacteriol, 187, 2426, 10.1128/JB.187.7.2426-2438.2005 · DOI · Paper page
  8. J Messing, 2006, Organization and variability of the maize genome., Curr Opin Plant Biol, 9, 157, 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.009 · DOI
  9. NM Springer, 2009, Maize inbreds exhibit high levels of copy number variation (CNV) and presence/absence variation (PAV) in genome content., PLoS Genet, 5, e1000734, 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000734 · DOI · Paper page
  10. J Lai, 2010, Genome-wide patterns of genetic variation among elite maize inbred lines., Nat Genet, 42, 1027, 10.1038/ng.684 · DOI · Paper page
  11. ES Buckler, 2006, Molecular and functional diversity of maize., Curr Opin Plant Biol, 9, 172, 10.1016/j.pbi.2006.01.013 · DOI · Paper page
  12. MA Gore, 2009, A first-generation haplotype map of maize., Science, 326, 1115, 10.1126/science.1177837 · DOI · Paper page
  13. DW Craig, 2008, Identification of genetic variants using bar-coded multiplexed sequencing., Nat Methods, 30, 887, 10.1038/nmeth.1251 · DOI · Paper page
  14. R Cronn, 2008, Multiplex sequencing of plant chloroplast genomes using Solexa sequencing-by-synthesis technology., Nucleic Acids Res, 36, e122, 10.1093/nar/gkn502 · DOI · Paper page
  15. X Huang, 2009, High-throughput genotyping by whole-genome resequencing., Genome Res, 19, 1068, 10.1101/gr.089516.108 · DOI · Paper page
  16. X Huang, 2010, Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces., Nat Genet, 42, 961, 10.1038/ng.695 · DOI · Paper page
  17. L Mamanova, 2010, Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing., Nat Methods, 7, 111, 10.1038/nmeth.1419 · DOI · Paper page
  18. M Gore, 2007, Evaluation of target preparation methods for single-feature polymorphism detection in large complex plant genomes., Crop Sci, 47, S135, 10.2135/cropsci2007.02.0085tpg · doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.02.0085tpg
  19. NA Baird, 2008, Rapid SNP discovery and genetic mapping using sequenced RAD markers., PLoS One, 3, e3376, 10.1371/journal.pone.0003376 · DOI · Paper page
  20. PS Schnable, 2009, The B73 maize genome: complexity, diversity and dynamics., Science, 326, 1112, 10.1126/science.1178534 · DOI · Paper page
  21. M Lee, 2002, Expanding the genetic map of maize with the intermated B73×Mo17 (IBM) population., Plant Mol Biol, 48, 453, 10.1023/A:1014893521186 · DOI · Paper page
  22. JM Costa, 2001, Molecular mapping of the Oregon Wolfe Barleys: a phenotypically polymorphic doubled-haploid population., Theor Appl Genet, 103, 415, 10.1007/s001220100622 · DOI
  23. JJ Doyle, 1987, A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissue., Phytochem Bull, 19, 11
  24. M Hamady, 2008, Error-correcting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex., Nat Methods, 5, 235, 10.1038/nmeth.1184 · DOI · Paper page
  25. MD McMullen, 2009, Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population., Science, 325, 737, 10.1126/science.1174320 · DOI · Paper page
  26. DL Remington, 2001, Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 98, 11479, 10.1073/pnas.201394398 · DOI · Paper page
  27. P Szucs, 2009, An integrated resource for barley linkage map and malting quality QTL alignment., Plant Genome, 2, 134, 10.3835/plantgenome2008.01.0005 · doi:10.3835/plantgenome2008.01.0005
  28. P Andolfatto, 2011, Multiplexed shotgun genotyping for rapid and efficient genetic mapping., Genome Res, 21, 10.1101/gr.115402.110 · DOI · Paper page
  29. P Vos, 1995, AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting., Nucleic Acids Res, 23, 4407, 10.1093/nar/23.21.4407 · DOI · Paper page
  30. M Fedurco, 2006, BTA, a novel reagent for DNA attachment on glass and efficient generation of solid–phase amplified DNA colonies., Nucleic Acids Res, 34, e22, 10.1093/nar/gnj023 · DOI · Paper page
  31. S Salvi, 2007, Conserved noncoding genomic sequences associated with a flowering-time quantitative trait locus in maize., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104, 11376, 10.1073/pnas.0704145104 · DOI · Paper page
  32. RM Clark, 2006, A distant upstream enhancer at the maize domestication gene tb1 has pleiotropic effects on plant and inflorescent architecture., Nature Genet, 38, 594, 10.1038/ng1784 · DOI · Paper page
  33. MA Arteaga-Vazquez, 2010, Paramutation in maize: RNA mediated trans-generational gene silencing., Curr Opin Genet Dev, 20, 156, 10.1016/j.gde.2010.01.008 · DOI

Cited by

See all 6,501

Metadata

Authors
Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Sun, Q., Poland, J. A., Kawamoto, K., Buckler, E. S., & Mitchell, S. E.
Venue
PLoS ONE
Published
2011-05-04
Volume
6
Issue
5
Pages
e19379
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2159474015
Cited by
6,501
References
4
FWCI
114.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1371/journal.pone.0019379
The paper
Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Sun, Q., Poland, J. A., Kawamoto, K., Buckler, E. S., & Mitchell, S. E. (2011). A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species. PLoS ONE. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019379

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.