Cited by 37Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Long-term progression of retinopathy after initiation of insulin therapy in Type�2 diabetes: an observational study

Open access
Arun, C.S., Pandit, R., Taylor, R.·2004·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis Universal worsening of retinopathy after starting insulin therapy in Type 2 diabetes has been suggested in previous work. Methods We studied 294 such patients for up to 5 years to evaluate retinal changes and define the factors affecting progression of retinopathy. Yearly retinal photographs were graded using the EURODIAB system. Results Prior to insulin therapy, 26.2% (77/294) of the patients had minimal non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy (NPDR), 3.7% (n=11) had moderate NPDR and 1% (n=3) had severe NPDR. Over the first 3 years of insulin therapy, significant progression occurred in 36 subjects (12.6%). This comprised 5/193 (2.6%) without any retinopathy at baseline, 22/77 (28.5%) with minimal NPDR and 6/11 with moderate NPDR (54.5%) (chi2=56.1, p<0.001). In a control group of 70 patients who remained on oral hypoglycaemic agents, nine patients had significant worsening of retinopathy over 3 years. Over 5 years, 22/127 (17.3%) of patients (9/95 without and 13/32 with retinopathy at baseline [chi2=16.2, p<0.001]) had significant progression of retinopathy. Higher baseline HbA1c (p=0.002) and lower initial decrease in HbA1c (p=0.007) were each independent predictors of greater retinopathy progression over this period. There was no significant worsening of visual acuity in patients whose retinopathy progressed. Conclusions/interpretation After initiation of insulin treatment in Type 2 diabetes, clinically significant worsening of retinopathy over a 3-year period was uncommon in those with no retinopathy (2.6%) but occurred in 31.8% of patients with any retinopathy at baseline. The risk of serious worsening of retinopathy after insulin therapy is started in all patients with Type 2 diabetes may have been previously overestimated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-004-1473-9

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a post-hoc analysis of the Look AHEAD dataset, a 10% weight loss in the first year, similar to that in DiRECT, was associated with a 21% decrease in occurrence of cardiovascular outcomes over a median follow-up of 10.2 years.

    “In a post-hoc analysis of the Look AHEAD dataset, a 10% weight loss in the first year, similar to that in the DiRECT, was associated with a 21% decrease in occurrence of cardiovascular outcomes over a median follow-up of 10•2 years.34”

    From Primary care-led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-label, cluster-randomised trial (2018) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Subject characteristics section reports retinopathy outcomes over three and five years after insulin initiation, not cardiovascular outcomes after weight loss. Searches for Look AHEAD, DiRECT, 10% weight loss, the 21% decrease, and 10.2-year follow-up found no passage addressing the claim in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arun, C. S., Pandit, R., & Taylor, R.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Arun, C.S.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2004-07-28
Volume
47
Issue
8
Pages
1380-4
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2051682994
Cited by
37
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
diabetic retinopathy, retinopathy progression, insulin therapy, type 2 diabetes, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, HbA1c, glycemic control, oral antidiabetic drugs, visual acuity
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Retinopathy, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Visual Acuity, Incidence, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review