Cited by 19Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsAdipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic DiseasesCell Adhesion Molecules Research

Are elevated circulating intercellular adhesion molecule 1 levels more strongly predictive of diabetes than vascular risk? Outcome of a prospective study in the elderly

Open access
for the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk Trial Study Group, Sattar, N., Murray, H. M., Welsh, P., Blauw, G. J., Buckley, B. M., de Craen, A. J., Ford, I. +9 more·2009·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis The aim of this prospective study was to determine whether circulating intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM) 1, as a potential surrogate of 'endothelial activation', is more strongly associated with risk of vascular events than with incident diabetes.Methods We related baseline ICAM-1 levels to vascular events (866 CHD and stroke events in 5,685 participants) and incident diabetes (292 in 4,945 without baseline diabetes) in the elderly over 3.2 years of follow-up.Results ICAM-1 levels correlated positively with triacylglycerol but negatively with LDL- and HDL-cholesterol. ICAM-1 levels were higher in those who developed diabetes (388.6 +/- 1.42 vs 369.4 +/- 1.39 ng/ml [mean+/-SD], p = 0.011) and remained independently associated with new-onset diabetes (HR 1.84, 95% CI 1.26-2.69, p = 0.0015 per unit increase in log[ICAM-1] after adjusting for classical risk factors and C-reactive protein). By contrast, ICAM-1 levels were not significantly (p = 0.40) elevated in those who had an incident vascular event compared with those who remained event-free, and corresponding adjusted risk associations were null (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.80-1.22, p = 0.89) in analyses adjusted for other risk factors.Conclusions/interpretation We show that elevated ICAM-1 levels are associated with risk of incident diabetes in the elderly at risk, despite no association with incident cardiovascular disease risk. We suggest that perturbations in circulating ICAM-1 levels are aligned more towards diabetes risk.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-008-1217-3

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • sICAM-1 has been shown to be associated with increased risk of future nonfatal cardiovascular events and incident diabetes.

    “sICAM-1 has been shown to be associated with increased risk of future nonfatal cardiovascular events and incident diabetes. 37,38”

    From Comprehensive Long-Term Changes in Cardiovascular Risk Biomarkers With Tirzepatide (2026) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results report that elevated ICAM-1 was associated with incident diabetes, but not with the primary CVD endpoint, coronary events, or stroke events in this elderly cohort. The Introduction mentions earlier studies linking ICAM-1 to vascular events, but does not establish the claimed association specifically for future nonfatal cardiovascular events. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
for the Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk Trial Study Group, Sattar, N., Murray, H. M., Welsh, P., Blauw, G. J., Buckley, B. M., de Craen, A. J., Ford, I., Forouhi, N. G., Freeman, D. J., Jukema, J. W., Macfarlane, P. W., Murphy, M. B., Packard, C. J., Stott, D. J., Westendorp, R. G. J., & Shepherd, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Glasgow (GB)
  • Leiden University Medical Center (NL)
  • Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Cork University Hospital (IE)
Corresponding author
Sattar, N.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2008-11-22
Volume
52
Issue
2
Pages
235-239
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2041327684
Cited by
19
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Stroke Association
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Cell Adhesion Molecules Research
Keywords
ICAM-1, circulating biomarkers, new-onset diabetes, cardiovascular events, coronary artery disease, stroke, endothelial activation, older adults, vascular risk, C-reactive protein
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure, Cholesterol, Diabetes Mellitus, Endothelium, Vascular, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Myocardial Infarction, Predictive Value of Tests, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Incidence, Pravastatin, Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Stroke

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review