Cited by 49Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsChronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes

Favourable effects of fenofibrate on lipids and cardiovascular disease in women with type 2 diabetes: results from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study

Open access
on behalf of the FIELD Study Investigators, d’Emden, Michael C., Jenkins, Alicia J., Li, Liping, Zannino, Diana, Mann, Kristy P., Best, James D., Stuckey, Bronwyn G. A. +3 more·2014·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis In the double-blind placebo-controlled Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes trial (n = 9,795), fenofibrate reduced major cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes. Sex-related differences in fenofibrate response could be clinically relevant and were pre-specified analyses.Methods Women (n = 3,657) and men (n = 6,138) with type 2 diabetes not using statins were assigned fenofibrate (200 mg/day) or placebo for 5 years. Effects on lipoproteins and total cardiovascular events were evaluated by sex.Results Baseline total, LDL-, HDL- and non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoproteins A-I and B differed between sexes, and these and triacylglycerol levels improved with fenofibrate in both sexes (all p < 0.001). Fenofibrate reduced total, LDL- and non-HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein B more in women (all p < 0.001), independent of menopausal status and statin uptake. Adjusted for covariates, fenofibrate reduced total cardiovascular outcomes (cardiovascular death, fatal and non-fatal stroke and carotid and coronary revascularisation) by 30% in women (95% CI 8%, 46%; p = 0.008) and 13% in men (95% CI -1%, 24%; p = 0.07) with no treatment-by-sex interaction (p > 0.1). In patients with high triacylglycerol levels and low HDL-cholesterol, fenofibrate reduced total cardiovascular outcomes by 30% (95% CI -7%, 54%) in women and 24% (95% CI 2%, 42%) in men, with no treatment-by-sex interaction (p > 0.1).Conclusions/interpretation Fenofibrate improved the lipoprotein profile more in women than men. Cardiovascular event reductions with fenofibrate were consistently similar in women and men, both overall and among those with low HDL-cholesterol and high triacylglycerol levels. These data provide reassurance about fenofibrate efficacy in women and men. Both sexes with type 2 diabetes should be considered for fenofibrate therapy for cardioprotection.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-014-3344-3

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ACCORD lipid study showed less primary event reduction with combination therapy in women, whereas the recent FIELD analysis showed consistent CV event reduction in women and men.

    “The ACCORD lipid study showed less primary event reduction with combination therapy in women, but the recent FIELD study analysis showed consistent CV event reduction in women and men. 315”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [315]

  • A recent FIELD study analysis showed consistent cardiovascular event reduction in women and men.

    “the recent FIELD study analysis showed consistent CV event reduction in women and men.315”

    From 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias (2016) · cites this paper as [315]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 23 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
on behalf of the FIELD Study Investigators, d’Emden, M. C., Jenkins, A. J., Li, L., Zannino, D., Mann, K. P., Best, J. D., Stuckey, B. G. A., Park, K., Saltevo, J., & Keech, A. C.
Affiliations
  • Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Nepean Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Keech, Anthony C.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2014-08-23
Volume
57
Issue
11
Pages
2296-2303
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2081494120
Cited by
49
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Sydney eScholarship Repository (The University of Sydney) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1024105, 1037786, 457103)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
Keywords
fenofibrate, type 2 diabetes, sex differences, women, cardiovascular events, lipoprotein profile, cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-I, apolipoprotein B, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, cardiovascular risk reduction, field trials, statin-naive patients, menopause, revascularization, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, cardioprotection, fibrates
MeSH terms
Aged, Hypolipidemic Agents, Apolipoproteins B, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Fenofibrate, Triglycerides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review