Cited by 8Sex and Gender in HealthcarePharmacogenetics and Drug MetabolismCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Sex-Related Differences in the Pharmacological Response in SARS-CoV-2 Infection, Dyslipidemia, and Diabetes Mellitus: A Narrative Review

Open access
Lombrea, Adelina, Romanescu, Mirabela, Jianu, Narcisa, Andor, Minodora, Suciu, Maria, Man, Dana Emilia, Danciu, Corina, Dehelean, Cristina Adriana +1 more·2023·Pharmaceuticals

Abstract

Pharmacological responses vary by sex in several illnesses. This narrative review summarizes sex variations in pharmaceutical response in SARS-CoV-2 infection, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. Infection with SARS-CoV-2 is more severe and deadly in men than women. This may be attributed to immunological responses, genetics, and hormones. Some research shows that men may respond better to genomic vaccinations and females to antiviral medications such as remdesivir (Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech). In dyslipidemia, women tend to have greater HDL-C and lower LDL-C than men. Some studies show that females may need lower statin dosages than men to obtain equal LDL-C reductions. Ezetimibe co-administered with a statin significantly improved lipid profile indicators in men compared to women. Statins reduce dementia risk. Atorvastatin decreased dementia risk in males (adjusted HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.88–0.97), whereas lovastatin lowered dementia risk in women (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58–0.95). In diabetes mellitus, evidence suggests that females may have a higher risk of developing certain complications such as diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy, despite having lower rates of cardiovascular disease than males. This could be the result of differences in hormonal influences and genetic factors. Some research shows females may respond better to oral hypoglycemic medications such as metformin. In conclusion, sex-related differences in pharmacological response have been observed in SARS-CoV-2 infection, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. Further research is needed to better understand these differences and to develop personalized treatment strategies for males and females with these conditions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ph16060853

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Semaglutide has demonstrated significant utility in managing type 2 diabetes and obesity as a GLP-1 receptor agonist.

    “The drug has demonstrated significant utility in managing type 2 diabetes and obesity, thanks to its action as a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (RA) [4,5,6].”

    From Assessment of Thyroid Carcinogenic Risk and Safety Profile of GLP1-RA Semaglutide (Ozempic) Therapy for Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review (2024) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Results, §2.3 (page unavailable), describe GLP-1 receptor agonists as antidiabetic medicines with hypoglycemic, fat-loss, and appetite-suppressing effects. Our copy does not identify semaglutide or establish its specific utility for managing type 2 diabetes and obesity, so it supports the class-level point but not the drug-specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Despite sharing a therapeutic class, individual GLP-1 RAs can exhibit diverse biological effects and safety profiles due to their distinct molecular structures and mechanisms of action.

    “This approach is grounded in the understanding that despite sharing a therapeutic class, individual GLP-1 RAs can exhibit diverse biological effects and safety profiles due to their distinct molecular structures and mechanisms of action [1,4,5,6].”

    From Assessment of Thyroid Carcinogenic Risk and Safety Profile of GLP1-RA Semaglutide (Ozempic) Therapy for Diabetes Mellitus and Obesity: A Systematic Literature Review (2024) · cites this paper as [6]

    Section 2.3 (Diabetes Mellitus; page unavailable) describes GLP-1RAs as a therapeutic class with several biological effects and a generally favorable safety profile. It discusses differences in response between men and women, but does not establish that individual GLP-1RAs differ from one another in effects or safety because of their molecular structures or mechanisms of action. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 125 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Nabil Abdelnaim Mohamed F. The Ethicist’s Practical Guide to the Evaluation of Preclinical Research from a Sex and Gender Perspective University of Zaragoza Zaragoza, Spain 2021 10.13140/RG.2.2.12655.97443 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lombrea, A., Romanescu, M., Jianu, N., Andor, M., Suciu, M., Man, D. E., Danciu, C., Dehelean, C. A., & Buda, V.
Affiliations
Victor Babeș University of Medicine and Pharmacy Timișoara (RO)
Corresponding author
  • Andor, Minodora
  • Danciu, Corina
Venue
Pharmaceuticals
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-06-07
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
853
ISSN
1424-8247 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4380263535
Cited by
8
References
125
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pharmaceuticals (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Sex and Gender in Healthcare
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
sex differences, pharmacological response, COVID-19 pandemic, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, sex hormones, statins, ezetimibe, atorvastatin, lovastatin, dementia risk, metformin, oral antidiabetic drugs, COVID-19 vaccines, remdesivir, diabetes complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review