Cited by 51Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchReproductive Health and Technologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fertility is reduced in women and in men with type 1 diabetes: results from the Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC)

Open access
on behalf of the T1DGC, Wiebe, Julia C., Santana, Angelo, Medina-Rodríguez, Nathan, Hernández, Marta, Nóvoa, Javier, Mauricio, Dídac, Wägner, Ana M.·2014·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis A recent Finnish study described reduced fertility in patients with childhood-onset type 1 diabetes. The Type 1 Diabetes Genetics Consortium (T1DGC) is an international programme studying the genetics and pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes that includes families with the disease. Our aim was to assess fertility, defined as number of offspring, in the affected and unaffected siblings included in the T1DGC.Methods Clinical information from participants aged ≥18 years at the time of examination was included in the present analysis. The number of offspring of affected and unaffected siblings was compared (in families including both) and the influence of birth year, disease duration and age of onset was assessed, the last in affected siblings only, using Poisson regression models.Results A total of 3010 affected and 801 unaffected adult siblings that belonged to 1761 families were assessed. The mean number of offspring was higher in the unaffected than in the affected individuals, and the difference between the two groups was more pronounced in women than men. Poisson regression analysis showed that both sex and birth cohort significantly affected the differences between groups. In the affected siblings, adult onset (≥18 years), female sex and older birth cohort were associated with higher fertility.Conclusions/interpretation Patients with type 1 diabetes have fewer children than their unaffected siblings. This effect is more evident in women and in older birth cohorts. Onset of type 1 diabetes as an adult rather than a child is associated with a higher number of offspring, even after accounting for birth cohort and disease duration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-014-3376-8

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Glycemic control worsens when persons with type 1 or type 2 diabetes move from pediatric to adult care.

    “Glycemic control has been shown to worsen during transition from pediatric to adult care for persons with T1D and T2D.1534,1535”

    From American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update. (2022) · cites this paper as [1534]

    The Methods and Results compare fertility by age of type 1 diabetes onset, not outcomes during a move from pediatric to adult care. The Discussion says information on glycaemic control was unavailable. Searches for care transition and glycaemic control found no passage addressing worsening control in either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
T1DGC, O. B. O. T., Wiebe, J. C., Santana, A., Medina-Rodríguez, N., Hernández, M., Nóvoa, J., Mauricio, D., & Wägner, A. M.
Affiliations
  • Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canaria (ES)
  • Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ES)
Corresponding author
Wägner, Ana M.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2014-09-14
Volume
57
Issue
12
Pages
2501-2504
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2065100064
Cited by
51
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Acceda (Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International (U01 DK062418)
  • European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes
  • Novo Nordisk
  • Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI11/, PI 10/02310, PI11/02441)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK062418, U01DK062418)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, fertility, offspring number, sex differences, adult-onset type 1 diabetes, birth cohort, disease duration
MeSH terms
Adult, Birth Rate, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Fertility, Humans, Infertility, Female, Infertility, Male, Male, Parity, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review