Cited by 137Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsBirth, Development, and Health

Long-term risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in relation to BMI and weight change among women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.

Open access
Bao, Wei, Yeung, Edwina, Tobias, Deirdre K., Hu, Frank B., Vaag, Allan A., Chavarro, Jorge E., Mills, James L., Grunnet, Louise G. +5 more·2015·Diabetologia

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis Women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are advised to control their weight after pregnancy. We aimed to examine how adiposity and weight change influence the long-term risk of developing type 2 diabetes after GDM.Methods We included 1,695 women who had incident GDM between 1991 and 2001, as part of the Diabetes & Women's Health study, and followed them until the return of the 2009 questionnaire. Body weight and incident type 2 diabetic cases were reported biennially. We defined baseline as the questionnaire period when women reported an incident GDM pregnancy. We estimated HRs and 95% CIs using Cox proportional hazards models.Results We documented 259 incident cases of type 2 diabetes during up to 18 years of follow-up. The adjusted HRs of type 2 diabetes associated with each 1 kg/m(2) increase in BMI were 1.16 (95% CI 1.12, 1.19) for baseline BMI and 1.16 (95% CI 1.13, 1.20) for most recent BMI. Moreover, each 5 kg increment of weight gain after GDM development was associated with a 27% higher risk of type 2 diabetes (adjusted HR 1.27; 95% CI 1.04, 1.54). Jointly, women who had a BMI ≥30.0 kg/m(2) at baseline and gained ≥5 kg after GDM had an adjusted HR of 43.19 (95% CI 13.60, 137.11), compared with women who had a BMI <25.0 kg/m(2) at baseline and gained <5 kg after GDM.Conclusions/interpretation Baseline BMI, most recent BMI and weight gain after GDM were significantly and positively associated with risk of progression from GDM to type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-015-3537-4

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A meta-analysis of 20 studies performed prior to the development of the IADPSG criteria and using varied criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes demonstrated that women with a history of gestational diabetes had a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared with women with a normoglycemic pregnancy (relative risk, 7.43).

    “A meta-analysis of 20 studies that were performed prior to the development of the IADPSG criteria and that used varied criteria to diagnose gestational diabetes demonstrated that women with a history of gestational diabetes had a higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes compared with women with a normoglycemic pregnancy (relative risk, 7.43).23”

    From Association of Gestational Diabetes With Maternal Disorders of Glucose Metabolism and Childhood Adiposity (2018) · cites this paper as [23]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bao, W., Yeung, E., Tobias, D. K., Hu, F. B., Vaag, A. A., Chavarro, J. E., Mills, J. L., Grunnet, L. G., Bowers, K., Ley, S. H., Kiely, M., Olsen, S. F., & Zhang, C.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Rigshospitalet (DK)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Statens Serum Institut (DK)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Cuilin
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2015-03-22
Volume
58
Issue
6
Pages
1212-1219
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2024686179
Cited by
137
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 1
FWCI
15.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • CUNY Academic Works (City University of New York) (submittedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (HHSN275201000020C)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA50385, UM1CA176726, R01CA050385)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK058845, P30DK046200, P30 DK-46200, DK58845)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (# HHSN275201000020C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, type 2 diabetes, body mass index, postpartum weight gain, obesity, diabetes risk, women
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Obesity, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Weight Gain, Body Mass Index, Multivariate Analysis, Proportional Hazards Models, Diabetes, Gestational, Adiposity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review