Diabetes digital app technology: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group
Abstract
Digital health technology, especially digital and health applications ('apps'), have been developing rapidly to help people manage their diabetes. Numerous health-related apps provided on smartphones and other wireless devices are available to support people with diabetes who need to adopt either lifestyle interventions or medication adjustments in response to glucose-monitoring data. However, regulations and guidelines have not caught up with the burgeoning field to standardise how mobile health apps are reviewed and monitored for patient safety and clinical validity. The available evidence on the safety and effectiveness of mobile health apps, especially for diabetes, remains limited. The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) have therefore conducted a joint review of the current landscape of available diabetes digital health technology (only stand-alone diabetes apps, as opposed to those that are integral to a regulated medical device, such as insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring systems, and automated insulin delivery systems) and practices of regulatory authorities and organisations. We found that, across the USA and Europe, mobile apps intended to manage health and wellness are largely unregulated unless they meet the definition of medical devices for therapeutic and/or diagnostic purposes. International organisations, including the International Medical Device Regulators Forum and WHO, have made strides in classifying different types of digital health technology and integrating digital health technology into the field of medical devices. As the diabetes digital health field continues to develop and become more fully integrated into everyday life, we wish to ensure that it is based on the best evidence for safety and efficacy. As a result, we bring to light several issues that the diabetes community, including regulatory authorities, policymakers, professional organisations, researchers, people with diabetes and healthcare professionals, needs to address to ensure that diabetes health technology can meet its full potential. These issues range from inadequate evidence on app accuracy and clinical validity to lack of training provision, poor interoperability and standardisation, and insufficient data security. We conclude with a series of recommended actions to resolve some of these shortcomings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Available evidence on the safety and effectiveness of diabetes health apps remains limited.
“Although widely used, the available evidence on the safety and effectiveness of diabetes health apps remains limited, with issues ranging from inadequate evidence on app accuracy and clinical validity to lack of training provision, poor interoperability and standardization, and insufficient data security (65).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin
(2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa012512 · Cited by 19,011 · see citing works
Tuomilehto, J., Lindström, J., Eriksson, J. G., Valle, T. T., Hämäläinen, H., Ilanne-Parikka, P., Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, S., Laakso, M., Louheranta, A., Rastas, M., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200105033441801 · Cited by 10,873 · see citing works
Gillies, C. L., Abrams, K. R., Lambert, P. C., Cooper, N. J., Sutton, A. J., Hsu, R. T., & Khunti, K. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39063.689375.55 · Cited by 1,171 · see citing works
Can Mobile Phone Apps Influence People’s Health Behavior Change? An Evidence Review
Zhao, J., Freeman, B., & Li, M. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5692 · Cited by 618 · see citing works
Martínez-Pérez, B., de la Torre-Díez, I., & López-Coronado, M. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2600 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Turner-McGrievy, G. M., Beets, M. W., Moore, J. B., Kaczynski, A. T., Barr-Anderson, D. J., & Tate, D. F. (2013) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001510 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Mobile Apps for the Management of Diabetes
Chavez, S., Fedele, D., Guo, Y., Bernier, A., Smith, M., Warnick, J., & Modave, F. (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc17-0853 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Huang, Z., Tao, H., Meng, Q., & Jing, L. (2015) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-14-0441 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- [5]5. Ramchandani N, Heptulla RA (2012) New technologies for diabetes: a review of the present and the future. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol 2012(1):28
- [8]8. Elenko E, Speier A, Zohar D (2015) A regulatory framework emerges for digital medicine. Nat Biotechnol 33(7):697 -702. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.3284 · DOI
- [13]13. Kebede MM, Pischke CR (2019) Popular diabetes apps and the impact of diabetes app use on self-care behaviour: a survey among the digital community of persons with diabetes on social media. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 10:135. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fendo.2019.00135
- [14]14. Bergenstal RM, Johnson M, Powers MA et al (2008) Adjust to target in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 31(7):1305 -1310. https:// doi.org/10.2337/dc07-2137 · DOI
- [15]15. Conroy DE, Yang CH, Maher JP (2014) Behavior change techniques in top-ranked mobile apps for physical activity. Am J Prev Med 46(6):649 -652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.01.010 · DOI
- [26]26. Hood M, Wilson R, Corsica J, Bradley L, Chirinos D, Vivo A (2016) What do we know about mobile applications for diabetes self-management? A review of reviews. J Behav Med 39(6):981 -994. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9765-3 · DOI · Paper page
- [27]27. Frøisland DH, Årsand E (2015) Integrating visual dietary documentation in mobile-phone-based self-management application for adolescents with type 1 diabetes. J Diabetes Sci Technol 9(3): 541 -548. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932296815576956 · DOI
- [30]30. Arnhold M, Quade M, Kirch W (2014) Mobile applications for diabetics: a systematic review and expert-based usability evaluation considering the special requirements of diabetes patients age 50 years or older. J Med Internet Res 16(4):e104
- [31]31. Drincic A, Prahalad P, Greenwood D, Klonoff DC (2016) Evidence-based mobile medical applications in diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 45(4):943 -965. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.ecl.2016.06.001
- [33]33. Kerr D, Gabbay RA, Klonoff DC (2018) Finding real value from digital diabetes health: is digital health dead or in need of resuscitation? J Diabetes Sci Technol 12(5):911 -913. https://doi.org/10. 1177/1932296818771200
- [34]34. Schuren J, Califf RM (2016) Need for a national evaluation system for health technology. JAMA 316(11):1153 -1154
- [39]39. Kramer DB, Xu S, Kesselheim AS (2012) Regulation of medical devices in the United States and European Union. N Engl J Med 36(9):848 -855
- [41]41. Van Norman GA (2016) Drugs and devices: comparison of European and U.S. approval processes. JACC Basic Transl Sci 1(5):399 -412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.06.003 · DOI · Paper page
- [50]50. Kvedar JC, Fogel AL, Elenko E, Zohar D (2016) Digital medicine ' s march on chronic disease. Nat Biotechnol 34(3):239 -246
- [64]64. Ventola CL (2014) Mobile devices and apps for health care professionals: uses and benefits. P T 39(5):356 -364
- [65]65. Baratloo A, Hosseini M, Negida A, el Ashal G (2015) Part 1: simple definition and calculation of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Emerg (Tehran) 3(2):48 -49
- [66]66. Hogan NM, Kerin MJ (2012) Smart phone apps: smart patients, steer clear. Patient Educ Couns 89(2):360 -361. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.pec.2012.07.016
- [68]68. Bierbrier R, Lo V, Wu RC (2014) Evaluation of the accuracy of smartphone medical calculation apps. J Med Internet Res 16(2): e32. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3062 · DOI
- [69]69. Lum E, Jimenez G, Huang Z et al (2019) Decision support and alerts of apps for self-management of blood glucose for type 2 diabetes. JAMA 321(15):1530 -1532. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.2019.1644
- [71]71. Ristau RA, Yang J, White JR (2013) Evaluation and evolution of diabetes mobile applications: key factors for health care professionals seeking to guide patients. Diabetes Spectrum 26(4):211 -215
- [80]80. Sardi L, Idri A, Fernandez-Aleman JL (2017) A systematic review of gamification in e-Health. J Biomed Inform 71:3148
- [81]81. Blenner SR, Köllmer M, Rouse AJ, Daneshvar N, Williams C, Andrews LB (2016) Privacy policies of android diabetes apps and sharing of health information. JAMA 315(10):1051 -1052. https:// doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.19426 · DOI
- [82]82. Klonoff DC (2015) Cybersecurity for connected diabetes devices. J Diabetes Sci Technol 9(5):1143 -1147. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1932296815583334
- [84]84. Wyatt JC (2018) How can clinicians, specialty societies and others evaluate and improve the quality of apps for patient use? BMC Med 16:225 Publisher ' s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. <!-- image -->
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Holt, R. I. G., DeVries, J. H., Hess-Fischl, A., Hirsch, I. B., Kirkman, M. S., Klupa, T., Ludwig, B., Nørgaard, K., Pettus, J., Renard, E., et al. (2021) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci21-0043 · Cited by 699 · see citing works
Self-citationChung, W. K., Erion, K., Florez, J. C., Hattersley, A. T., Hivert, M.-F., Lee, C. G., McCarthy, M. I., Nolan, J. J., Norris, J. M., Pearson, E. R., et al. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci20-0022 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Grunberger, G., Sherr, J., Allende, M., Blevins, T., Bode, B., Handelsman, Y., Hellman, R., Lajara, R., Roberts, V. L., Rodbard, D., et al. (2021) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.1016/j.eprac.2021.04.008 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Chung, W. K., Erion, K., Florez, J. C., Hattersley, A. T., Hivert, M.-F., Lee, C. G., McCarthy, M. I., Nolan, J. J., Norris, J. M., Pearson, E. R., et al. (2020) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-020-05181-w · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Effectiveness of Disease-Specific mHealth Apps in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus: Scoping Review
Eberle, C., Löhnert, M., & Stichling, S. (2021) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/23477 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
“In addition, data safety in mHealth apps is a serious concern, as they deal with sensitive data [28,39,81].”
Digital Technology for Diabetes
Hughes, M. S., Addala, A., & Buckingham, B. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra2215899 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Nagori, A., Keshvani, N., Patel, L., Dhruve, R., & Sumarsono, A. (2024) · Preventive Medicine Reports · doi:10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102895 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Designing Disease-Specific mHealth Apps for Clinical Value
Keshavjee, K., Johnston-Jewell, D., Lee, B., & Kyba, R. (2022) · Smart and Pervasive Healthcare · doi:10.5772/intechopen.99945 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fleming, G. A., Petrie, J. R., Bergenstal, R. M., Holl, R. W., Peters, A. L., & Heinemann, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- Park Nicollet Clinic (US)
- Universität Ulm (DE)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Fleming, G. Alexander
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetologia
- Published
- 2019-12-05
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-241
- ISSN
- 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
- 1432-0428
- OpenAlex
- W2992264800
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 13.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- diabetes apps, mobile health, digital health technologies, diabetes self-management, medical device regulation, clinical validity, interoperability, data security, patient safety, regulatory standards, health technology policy
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Europe, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, United States, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Consensus, Mobile Applications
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review