Cited by 53Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementSkin Diseases and DiabetesHealth disparities and outcomes

Geospatial mapping and data linkage uncovers variability in outcomes of foot disease according to multiple deprivation: a population cohort study of people with diabetes.

Open access
Hurst, Joanne E., Barn, Ruth, Gibson, Lesley, Innes, Hamish, Bus, Sicco A., Kennon, Brian, Wylie, David, Woodburn, James·2020·Diabetologia

Abstract

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Our aim was to investigate the geospatial distribution of diabetic foot ulceration (DFU), lower extremity amputation (LEA) and mortality rates in people with diabetes in small geographical areas with varying levels of multiple deprivation. METHODS: We undertook a population cohort study to extract the health records of 112,231 people with diabetes from the Scottish Care Information - Diabetes Collaboration (SCI-Diabetes) database. We linked this to health records to identify death, LEA and DFU events. These events were geospatially mapped using multiple deprivation maps for the geographical area of National Health Service (NHS) Greater Glasgow and Clyde. Tests of spatial autocorrelation and association were conducted to evaluate geographical variation and patterning, and the association between prevalence-adjusted outcome rates and multiple deprivation by quintile. RESULTS: Within our health board region, people with diabetes had crude prevalence-adjusted rates for DFU of 4.6% and for LEA of 1.3%, and an incidence rate of mortality preceded by either a DFU or LEA of 10.5 per 10,000 per year. Spatial autocorrelation identified statistically significant hot spot (high prevalence) and cold spot (low prevalence) clusters for all outcomes. Small-area maps effectively displayed near neighbour clustering across the health board geography. Disproportionately high numbers of hot spots within the most deprived quintile for DFU (p < 0.001), LEA (p < 0.001) and mortality (p < 0.001) rates were found. Conversely, a disproportionately higher number of cold spots was found within the least deprived quintile for LEA (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: In people with diabetes, DFU, LEA and mortality rates are associated with multiple deprivation and form geographical neighbourhood clusters.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00125-019-05056-9

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People identifying as non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic of any race have more advanced diabetic foot ulcers and peripheral artery disease at initial presentation and are more likely to undergo lower extremity amputation without a lower extremity revascularization attempt.

    “People identifying as non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic of any race have more advanced diabetic foot ulcers and peripheral artery disease at initial presentation and are more likely to undergo lower extremity amputation without a lower extremity revascularization attempt.[16][17][18]”

    From Diabetic Foot Ulcers (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hurst, J. E., Barn, R., Gibson, L., Innes, H., Bus, S. A., Kennon, B., Wylie, D., & Woodburn, J.
Affiliations
  • Glasgow Caledonian University (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL)
  • Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Hurst, Joanne E.
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
2019-12-17
Volume
63
Issue
3
Pages
659-667
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2996177038
Cited by
53
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9
FWCI
3.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • ResearchOnline (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Glasgow Caledonian University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
diabetic foot ulcer, lower limb amputation, diabetes mortality, multiple deprivation, spatial clustering, small-area mapping, health disparities, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cultural Deprivation, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Geography, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Scotland, Socioeconomic Factors, Cohort Studies, Information Storage and Retrieval, Treatment Outcome, Diabetic Foot, Electronic Health Records, Geographic Mapping, Patient Outcome Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review