Cited by 320Pancreatic function and diabetesBirth, Development, and HealthDiabetes and associated disorders

In utero undernutrition impairs rat beta-cell development

Open access
Garofano, A., Czernichow, P., Bréant, B.·1997·Diabetologia

Abstract

The role of nutrition on the development of the endocrine pancreas was studied in a rat model obtained by maternal food restriction. A 50% food restriction was applied to female rats from day 15 of pregnancy and resulted in intrauterine growth-retardation (IUGR) in the offspring. At day 1 postnatal, beta-cell mass was significantly decreased in IUGR pups as compared to controls (0.70 +/- 0.06 vs 1.07 +/- 0.06 mg, p < 0.0001), as well as insulin content. This change in beta-cell mass can be attributed to a reduced number of islets, since the density of insulin-positive aggregates in pancreatic sections of IUGR rats was 20% lower than in controls. Proliferative capacity of beta cells, as measured by 5-bromo-2-deoxyuridine (BrdU) labelling index, was not altered in growth-retarded animals. Body as well as pancreatic weight were fully recovered in IUGR pups after 21 days of normal feeding by control mothers. However, these animals retained a 25% decrease in insulin content, 40% decrease in beta-cell mass (1.58 +/- 0.18 vs 2.78 +/- 0.42 mg, p < 0.001) and a strong reduction in the density of insulin positive aggregates per cm2, as compared to controls, suggesting that the total islet number was likely to be reduced. Beta-cell proliferative capacity remained normal. In conclusion, in utero undernutrition in rats does not impede postnatal growth but durably impairs beta-cell development. Impairment of beta-cell differentiation might be suggested.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s001250050812

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Undernutrition in utero is associated with reduced β-cell number in animal studies.

    “Further, animal studies suggest that undernutrition in utero is associated with reduced β-cell number [51].”

    From The Pathophysiology of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (2018) · cites this paper as [51]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Garofano, A., Czernichow, P., & Bréant, B.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
Diabetologia
Published
1997-09-18
Volume
40
Issue
10
Pages
1231-1234
ISSN
  • 0012-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0428
OpenAlex
W2004145345
Cited by
320
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 17
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetologia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
maternal food restriction, beta-cell development, beta-cell mass, islet number, insulin content, fetal growth restriction, beta-cell proliferation, pancreatic development, developmental programming, postpartum recovery
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Female, Fetal Growth Retardation, Immunohistochemistry, Islets of Langerhans, Nutrition Disorders, Pregnancy, Rats, Wistar, Mice, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review