Thinking life is not worth living: A population survey of Great Britain
Abstract
Background "Saving lives: our healthier nation" includes a target to reduce the death rate from suicide. Thoughts of suicide and feeling life is not worth living might be the first step in a pathway that can end in completed suicide. This study aims to identify factors associated with feeling life is not worth living amongst the household population of Great Britain, and to assess the strength of these associations after taking account of an individual's level of psychiatric morbidity. Methods The 1993 OPCS National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys of Great Britain assessed psychiatric morbidity using the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule amongst a stratified, clustered probability sample of 9830 subjects representative of the British private household population aged 16-64. Results Of the sample 0.8 % (95 % CI 0.6 %-1 %) had thoughts of suicide in the week before interview and 3.1 % (95 % CI 2.7 %-3.5 %) reported thoughts of life not worth living in the week before interview. Psychiatric morbidity was most strongly associated with such thoughts. Ethnicity, marital status and low social support were strongly associated with such thoughts after adjusting for age, sex and psychiatric morbidity. Conclusions Reducing psychiatric morbidity in the population as a whole might also decrease the frequency of suicidal thoughts. Policies which improve social support at a population level might also have a large impact on prevalence of suicidal thoughts.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Among people with passive suicidal thoughts, most do not go on to experience active suicidal ideation involving thoughts of killing themselves.
“The literature on suicide indicates that among those who have passive thoughts of suicide (e.g., “I would be better off dead”), most will not experience active suicidal ideation involving thoughts of killing themselves (Thomas, Crawford, Meltzer, & Lewis, 2002).”
From The interpersonal theory of suicide. (2010) · cites this paper as Thomas, Crawford, Meltzer, & Lewis, 2002
Cites
Lewis, G., Pelosi, A. J., Araya, R., & Dunn, G. (1992) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700030415 · Cited by 1,487 · see citing works
Self-citation(1998) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00033-0 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
Ecological study of social fragmentation, poverty, and suicide
Whitley, E., Gunnell, D., Dorling, D., & Smith, G. D. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7216.1034 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
The National Psychiatric Morbidity Surveys of Great Britain – strategy and methods
JENKINS, R., BEBBINGTON, P., BRUGHA, T., FARRELL, M., GILL, B., LEWIS, G., MELTZER, H., & PETTICREW, M. (1997) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329179700531x · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The interpersonal theory of suicide.
Van Orden, K. A., Witte, T. K., Cukrowicz, K. C., Braithwaite, S. R., Selby, E. A., & Joiner, T. E. (2010) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0018697 · Cited by 5,292 · see citing works
Impact of screening for risk of suicide: randomised controlled trial
Crawford, M. J., Thana, L., Methuen, C., Ghosh, P., Stanley, S. V., Ross, J., Gordon, F., Blair, G., & Bajaj, P. (2011) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.110.083592 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Self-citationJoling, K. J., O'Dwyer, S. T., Hertogh, C. M. P. M., & van Hout, H. P. J. (2018) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.4708 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
FAIRWEATHER, A. K., ANSTEY, K. J., RODGERS, B., & BUTTERWORTH, P. (2006) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291706007823 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
- Authors
- Thomas, H. V., Crawford, M., Meltzer, H., & Lewis, G.
- Affiliations
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Office for National Statistics (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- Venue
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 351-356
- ISSN
- 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
- 1433-9285
- OpenAlex
- W1966032200
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse
- Keywords
- suicidal ideation, suicide prevention, psychiatric morbidity, social support, ethnicity, marital status, Great Britain
- MeSH terms
- Suicide Prevention, Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Social Support, Socioeconomic Factors, Suicide, Logistic Models, Odds Ratio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review