Cited by 85Health disparities and outcomesMental Health Treatment and AccessChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Children’s mental health service use, neighbourhood socioeconomic deprivation, and social capital

van der Linden, Jikke, Drukker, Marjan, Gunther, Nicole, Feron, Frans, van Os, Jim·2003·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Background There is accumulating evidence that the shared social environment at the neighbourhood level exerts significant effects on health over and above individual level variables. The aim of this study was to assess the interactive influence of neighbourhood measures of socioeconomic deprivation and social capital (i. e. informal social control, social cohesion and trust) on children's mental health service use, independent of individual level confounders.Methods Two different data sources were used: 1) individual socioeconomic measures, derived from a case-control study in which case/control status indicated mental health service use or not, and 2) neighbourhood measures of socioeconomic deprivation and social capital. The data were subjected to multilevel logistic regression analysis.Results Children living in more deprived neighbourhoods run a higher risk of coming into contact with mental health care services. The social capital variables (informal social control and social cohesion and trust) did not exert main effects, but strong trust and social cohesion between citizens in the neighbourhood mitigated the risk-increasing effect of socioeconomic deprivation on children's mental health service use.Conclusions The deleterious effects of socioeconomic deprivation on mental health service use in children are sensitive to the context of cohesion and trust in neighbourhoods. Effects of deprivation on children's mental health cannot be interpreted without taking into account the context of social capital.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-003-0665-9

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
van der Linden, J., Drukker, M., Gunther, N., Feron, F., & van Os, J.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • Gemeente Maastricht (NL)
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2003-09
Volume
38
Issue
9
Pages
507-514
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W1987135684
Cited by
85
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
child mental health, mental health service utilization, social capital, informal social control, social cohesion, trust, neighborhood effects
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Catchment Area, Health, Child, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Male, Netherlands, Poverty Areas, Psychosocial Deprivation, Residence Characteristics, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review