Cited by 213Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies

Social interactions in adolescent and adult Sprague–Dawley rats: Impact of social deprivation and test context familiarity

Open access
VARLINSKAYA, E·2008·Behavioural Brain Research

Abstract

Interactions with peers become particularly important during adolescence, and age differences in social interactions have been successfully modeled in rats. To determine the impact of social deprivation on social interactions under anxiogenic (unfamiliar) or non-anxiogenic (familiar) test circumstances during ontogeny, the present study used a modified social interaction test to assess the effects of 5 days of social isolation or group housing on different components of social behavior in early [postnatal day (P) 28], mid (P35), or late (P42) adolescent and adult (P70) male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. As expected, testing in an unfamiliar environment suppressed social interactions regardless of age, housing, and sex. Social deprivation drastically enhanced all forms of social behavior in P28 animals regardless of test situation, whereas depriving older animals of social interactions had more modest effects and was restricted predominantly to play fighting -- an adolescent-characteristic form of social interactions. Social investigation -- more adult-typical form of social behavior was relatively resistant to isolation-induced enhancement and was elevated in early adolescent isolates only. These findings confirm that different forms of social behavior are differentially sensitive to social deprivation across ontogeny.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbr.2007.11.024

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
VARLINSKAYA, E.
Affiliations
Binghamton University (US)
Corresponding author
VARLINSKAYA, E
Venue
Behavioural Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-04-09
Volume
188
Issue
2
Pages
398-405
ISSN
0166-4328 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2150483785
Cited by
213
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 10
FWCI
14.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioural Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01AA016887, R01AA012453)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA019071)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Keywords
social deprivation, social isolation, social interaction, adolescent development, ontogeny, social investigation, play fighting, sex differences, Sprague-Dawley rats, housing conditions
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Analysis of Variance, Animals, Animals, Newborn, Behavior, Animal, Female, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Motor Activity, Social Isolation, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Recognition, Psychology, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review