CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 161Mental Health Treatment and AccessAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Subsyndromal depression: prevalence, use of health services and quality of life in an Australian population

Goldney, Robert D., Fisher, Laura J., Dal Grande, Eleonora, Taylor, Anne W.·2004·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
DOI 10.1007/s00127-004-0745-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background A study of the prevalence, use of services and quality of life of those with subsyndromal depression in a random and representative Australian population.Methods A face-to-face Health Omnibus survey of 3010 respondents administered the mood module of the PRIME-MD and the SF-36 and AQoL quality of life instruments.Results Subsyndromal depressive symptoms were identified in 12.9% of respondents. There was a gradation of use of services from those with no depression, to those with subsyndromal, other and major depressions. Those with subsyndromal depression scored significantly worse on quality of life measures than those with no depression, but the effect size was small and less than the poorer functioning of those with other depressive syndromes, particularly major depression.Conclusions Subsyndromal depression is very prevalent in the community and worthy of clinical consideration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-004-0745-5

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 161

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Goldney, R. D., Fisher, L. J., Dal Grande, E., & Taylor, A. W.
Affiliations
The University of Adelaide (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2004-04
Volume
39
Issue
4
Pages
293-298
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
DOI
10.1007/s00127-004-0745-5
OpenAlex
W1971744122
Cited by
161
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
subthreshold depression, depressive symptoms, prevalence, health care utilization, quality of life, major depressive disorder, community mental health, PRIME-MD, SF-36, AQoL
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Health Services, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, South Australia, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review