Cited by 42Mental Health Treatment and AccessMigration, Health and TraumaPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

The detection of psychological problems by General Practitioners: Influence of ethnicity and other demographic variables

Maginn, S., Boardman, A.P., Craig, T.K.J., Haddad, M., Heath, G., Stott, J.·2004·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Background Common mental illness in Black Africans and Black Caribbeans has been relatively little studied in the UK. Previous studies of the detection of psychological problems by General Practitioners (GPs) in these groups have been inconclusive.Aims The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence, detection and management of psychological problems in General Practice among Black Caribbeans and Black Africans compared to White English attenders and to examine the relative contribution of other sociodemographic factors to these main outcome variables.Method Consecutive attenders aged 16-65 years at 18 General Practitioners in South-East London completed the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) before seeing the GP. The GPs rated the current emotional state of the patients at the end of each consultation. Comparison of the GHQ and GP ratings was used to compute the detection indices.Results A total of 1211 patients aged 16-65 years were approached to take part in the study. Of the patients, 75 (6%) declined or were not able to complete the GHQ. In all, 994 individuals had both GP and GHQ ratings. There was an overall probable prevalence of 37%, of which 73% were identified as cases by the GPs. Black African patients had lower rates of common mental disorders, were less likely to be detected as psychiatric cases by the GP and less likely to receive active management for their psychological problems than Black Caribbean and White English patients. Rates of prevalence, detection and management were similar between Black Caribbean and White English patients. In the multivariate analysis, ethnicity, employment and age all played a significant independent role in predicting probable prevalence. The patients' reported decision to talk to their GP about psychological problems was the main predictor of detection. Ethnicity did not independently predict detection, but Black African cases were less likely to say that they would talk to their GP about psychological problems. GPs' identification indices mirrored probable prevalence, suggesting that GPs were more sensitive to detecting psychiatric illness in individuals belonging to groups which commonly presented as symptomatic.Conclusions The findings suggest that in General Practice the prevalence of common mental disorders, their detection and management in Black Caribbeans are similar to those in White English, but that Black Africans have lower prevalence, are less likely to be detected and are less likely to receive active management. The study of GP consulters presents problems for the interpretation of these results and it may be that Black Africans with psychological problems are less likely than their Caribbean and English counterparts to attend their GP, and less willing to speak to them about these problems when they do. Future similar studies should distinguish Black African and Black Caribbean subjects in their analyses, as categories such as 'Afro-Caribbean' may mask important differences in attitudes and illness behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-004-0751-7

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 18 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maginn, S., Boardman, A. P., Craig, T. K. J., Haddad, M., Heath, G., & Stott, J.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2004-06
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
464-71
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W2333404478
Cited by
42
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
common mental disorders, general practitioners, Black Africans, Black Caribbean, ethnic differences in mental health, prevalence of mental disorders, help-seeking, general practitioner visits, ethnic minority health, South East London, General Health Questionnaire, age and mental health
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Demography, Diagnosis, Differential, Ethnicity, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Primary Health Care, Professional Competence, Surveys and Questionnaires, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review