Cited by 68Psychiatric care and mental health servicesMental Health Treatment and AccessHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

A systematic review of home treatment services: Classification and sustainability

Wright, Christine, Catty, Jocelyn, Watt, Hilary, Burns, Tom·2004·Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology

Abstract

Background In view of the plethora of different community-based mental health services, there is a clear need for a classification based on service components rather than labels. Moreover, the sustainability of experimental services beyond their research studies is rarely reported.Methods As part of a systematic review of home treatment for mental health problems, authors of all included studies were followed up for data on service components and sustainability. Associations between components were explored.Results There was evidence of a core group of components co-occurring in home treatment services: regularly visiting at home, taking responsibility for health and social care, having smaller caseloads, multidisciplinary teams, integrated psychiatrists and a high proportion of contacts at home. Fifty-four per cent of services no longer existed, of which almost half had ended by the study's publication date. There was a significant association between sustainability and the study's hospitalisation outcome.Conclusions Some of the related service components presented here were associated with reducing hospitalisation. This group cannot, however, be used to provide a new taxonomy of services. It is imperative that future studies prospectively record and report service components to enable better classification. It is of concern that policy is currently predicated on research findings regardless of whether or not the experimental service was sustainable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00127-004-0818-5

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

3 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wright, C., Catty, J., Watt, H., & Burns, T.
Affiliations
St George's, University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Wright, Christine
Venue
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
Published
2004-06-01
Volume
39
Issue
10
Pages
789-796
ISSN
  • 0933-7954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1433-9285
OpenAlex
W2332715683
Cited by
68
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
0.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
home treatment, community mental health services, service components, service sustainability, service classification, multidisciplinary team, caseload size, hospitalization outcomes, home visits
MeSH terms
Community Mental Health Services, Home Care Services, Humans, Patient Care Team, Personnel Staffing and Scheduling, Program Evaluation, Workload, Statistics, Nonparametric

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review